?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=A+Refutation+of+Penrose's+Godelian+Case+Against+Artificial+Intelligence&rft.creator=Bringsjord%2C+Selmer&rft.subject=Artificial+Intelligence&rft.subject=Philosophy+of+Mind&rft.description=Having%2C+as+it+is+generally+agreed%2C+failed+to+destroy+the+computational+conception+of+mind+with+the+G%5C%22%7Bo%7Ddelian+attack+he+articulated+in+his+%7B%5Cem+The+Emperor's+New+Mind%7D%2C+Penrose+has+returned%2C+armed+with+a+more+elaborate+and+more+fastidious+G%5C%22%7Bo%7Ddelian+case%2C+expressed+in+and+3+of+his+%7B%5Cem+Shadows+of+the+Mind%7D.+The+core+argument+in+these+chapters+is+enthymematic%2C+and+when+formalized%2C+a+remarkable+number+of+technical+glitches+come+to+light.+Over+and+above+these+defects%2C+the+argument%2C+at+best%2C+is+an+instance+of+either+the+fallacy+of+denying+the+antecedent%2C+the+fallacy+of+%7B%5Cem+petitio+principii%7D%2C+or+the+fallacy+of+equivocation.+More+recently%2C+writing+in+response+to+his+critics+in+the+electronic+journal+%7B%5Cem+Psyche%7D%2C+Penrose+has+offered+a+G%5C%22%7Bo%7Ddelian+case+designed+to+improve+on+the+version+presented+in+%7B%5Cem+SOTM%7D.+But+this+version+is+yet+again+another+failure.+In+falling+prey+to+the+errors+we+uncover%2C+Penrose's+new+G%5C%22%7Bo%7Ddelian+case+is+unmasked+as+the+same+confused+refrain+J.R.+Lucas+initiated+35+years+ago.&rft.date=2000&rft.type=Preprint&rft.type=PeerReviewed&rft.format=application%2Fpdf&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F553%2F3%2Fpen.sel8.pdf&rft.identifier=++Bringsjord%2C+Selmer++(2000)+A+Refutation+of+Penrose's+Godelian+Case+Against+Artificial+Intelligence.++%5BPreprint%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F553%2F