---
abstract: 'This research examined the precision of the pCI rule through three experiments. The results show that first , the tendency of the subjects’ casual judgments was basically similar to the pCI rule. But (a + d) / n predicted human’s casual judgments were even better; second, the increase of subjects’ casual judgments was milder than the pCI rule, and the subjects needed time to construct their own way of judging relationship; finally, different people had different ways of causal judgments, and could be grouped into some categories.'
altloc: []
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Shao
given: Z. F.
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Wang
given: J.
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 2005
date_type: published
datestamp: 2007-08-20
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/56/61
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 5661
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/5661/1/An_Experimental_Research_on_the_pCI_Rule_and_Causal_Judgment.pdf
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'causal power, pCI, style of causal judgment'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:56:56
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: ' 946-948'
pubdom: FALSE
publication: Psychological Science
publisher: ~
refereed: FALSE
referencetext: ~
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 17:11:21
subjects:
- cog-psy
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: An Experimental Research on the pCI Rule and Causal Judgment (in Chinese)
type: journalp
userid: 542
volume: 28