6077
25
4000
4
19567
document
4000
20085.pdf
application/pdf
4743684
20091208 21:05:41
http://cogprints.org/6077/1/20085.pdf
6077
1
application/pdf
application/pdf
en
public
20085.pdf

http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion
http://cogprints.org/id/document/7105

http://eprints.org/relation/haspreviewThumbnailVersion
http://cogprints.org/id/document/7105

http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion
http://cogprints.org/id/document/7105

http://eprints.org/relation/hasVolatileVersion
http://cogprints.org/id/document/7791

http://eprints.org/relation/hasVersion
http://cogprints.org/id/document/7791

http://eprints.org/relation/hasIndexCodesVersion
http://cogprints.org/id/document/7791
archive
4745
disk0/00/00/60/77
20080518 01:17:47
20110311 08:57:07
20080518 01:17:47
techreport
show
0
The paper discusses the terminology behind batik crafting and showed the aspects of selfsimilarity in its ornaments. Even though a product of batik cannot be reduced merely into its decorative properties, it is shown that computation can capture some interesting aspects in the batikmaking ornamentation. There are three methods that can be exploited to the generative batik, i.e.: using fractal as the main source of decorative patterns, the hybrid batik that is emerged from the acquisition of LSystem ThueMorse algorithm for the harmonization within the grand designs by using both fractal images and traditional batik patterns, and using the random image tessellation as well as previous tiling algorithms for generating batik designs. The latest can be delivered by using a broad sources of motifs and traditionally recognized graphics. The paper concludes with certain aspects that shows how the harmony of traditional crafting and modern computation could bring us a more creative aspects of the beautiful harmony inherited in the aesthetic aspects of batik crafting.

Situngkir
Hokky
Computational Sociology
Bandung Fe Institute
pub
batik, fractal, selfsimilarity, creativity, aesthetics.
TRUE
TRUE
Bak, P.(1996). How Nature Works: The Science of Selforganized Criticality. SpringerVerlag.
Barnsley. M. F. (1988). Fractals Everywhere. Academic Press.
Doellah, H. S. (2002). Batik: The Impact of Time and Environment. Danar Hadi.
Hariadi, Y. (2008). “Fractal Geometry on Batik”. Journal of Social Complexity 3 (2): 4152.
Hasanudin. (2001). Batik Pesisiran: Melacak Pengaruh Etos Dagang Santri pada Ragam Hias Batik. Kiblat.
Kappraff, J. (2002). Beyond Measure: A Guided Tour Through Nature, Myth, and Number. World Scientific.
Kerlogue, F. (1997). Scattered Flowers: Textiles from Jambi, Sumatera. Center for SouthEast Asian Studies. University of Hull.
Malkevitch, J. (2003). “Mathematics and Art”. Feature Column April 2003. American Mathematical Society. URL: http://www.ams.org/featurecolumn/archive/art1.html
Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman.
Peitgen, HO., & Saupe, D. (1988). The Science of Fractal Images. SpringerVerlag.
Situngkir, H. (2005). “What is the Relatedness of Mathematics and Art and Why We Should Care?”. BFI Working Paper Series WPK2005.
Sondari, K. & Yusmawati. (2000). Batik Pesisir. Cultural Media Development Project – Departement of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia.
Weisstein, E. W. (1999). MathWorldA Wolfram Web Resource. URL: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/
Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media Inc.
Wells, D. (1991). The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry. Penguin
Weisstein, E. W. (2008). "Peano Curve." MathWorldA Wolfram Web Resource. URL: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PeanoCurve.html
WPV2008
 philsci
 compscicomplextheory
 compscihci
 cogpsy
The computational generative patterns in Indonesian batik
published
200803
public