--- abstract: 'Examination of records and personal documents of 1309 human beings isolated an apparent order of sensory ability changes, for 154 members of the sample both records and personal documents were available. The five changes in the apparent order are (a) an improvement in auditory perception that always includes an increase in complexity of speech, (b) an improvement in ability to taste or to smell or both and comparative myopia in which the developing human being becomes more near-sighted than he or she has been, (c) an increase in ability to discern and separate aural or visual or aural and visual stimuli simultaneously received, (d) comparative hyperopia, and (e) a marked increase in ability in one or more up to all five of the sensory abilities considered in the research: audition, vision, gustation, olfaction, and touch. Truncation of movement through the order is a salient feature, and the fourth change, comparative hyperopia, may be skipped. If the apparent order is significant and supportable, it may lead to new, productive research in many affected disciplines.' altloc: [] chapter: ~ commentary: ~ commref: ~ confdates: ~ conference: ~ confloc: ~ contact_email: ~ creators_id: - anne.lehmann@comcast.net creators_name: - family: Lehmann given: A. honourific: '' lineage: '' date: 2009-12-28 date_type: submitted datestamp: 2009-12-31 14:59:51 department: ~ dir: disk0/00/00/67/62 edit_lock_since: ~ edit_lock_until: ~ edit_lock_user: ~ editors_id: [] editors_name: [] eprint_status: archive eprintid: 6762 fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/6762/1/An_Apparent_Order_of_Sensory.pdf full_text_status: public importid: ~ institution: ~ isbn: ~ ispublished: ~ issn: ~ item_issues_comment: [] item_issues_count: 0 item_issues_description: [] item_issues_id: [] item_issues_reported_by: [] item_issues_resolved_by: [] item_issues_status: [] item_issues_timestamp: [] item_issues_type: [] keywords: Sensory development; Sensory ability; Hyperopia; Child development; Olfactory; Vision; Sensory ability changes; Myopia; Comparative hyperopia; Comparative myopia; Presbyopia; Mathematical ability; Cognitive change; Functional literacy; Cognitive neurology; Behavioral neurology; Psychology; Physiology; Human development; Cognitive change; Perceptual cognitive psychology. lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:57:34 latitude: ~ longitude: ~ metadata_visibility: show note: ~ number: ~ pagerange: ~ pubdom: TRUE publication: ~ publisher: ~ refereed: FALSE referencetext: "Allport, G. 1942. Use of personal documents in psychological science. Bulletin 40. New York: Social Science Research Council.\r\n\r\nAllport, G. 1942. Use of personal documents in psychological science. New York: Social Science Research Council.\r\n\r\nAllport, G. 1961. Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.\r\n\r\nArkin, H. and Colton, R. 1956. Statistical methods. New York: Barnes & Noble.\r\n\r\nBernard, H. R. 1994. Research methods in anthropology (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\r\n\r\nBlock, J. 1971. Lives through time. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft.\r\n\r\nBloom, P. 2000. How children learn the meaning of words. Cambridge: MIT Press. Pp. 35-43.\r\n\r\nCholewiak, R. and Collins, A. 1991. Sensory and physiological bases of touch. In M. Heller and W. Schiff (Eds.), The psychology of touch. Pp. 23-60. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.\r\n\r\nCurtin, B. 1985. The myopias. New York: Harper & Row.\r\n\r\nDapretto, M. and Bjork, E. 2000. The development of word retrieval abilities in the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth. Child Development, 71(3), 635-648.\r\n\r\nEisenberg, L. 1972. The human nature of human nature. Science, 176, 123-128.\r\n\r\nFledelius, H., Alsbirk, P. and Goldschmidt, E. (Eds.). 1981.Third international conference on myopia. The Hague: Dr. W. Junk.\r\n\r\nFrancois, J. 1961. Heredity in ophthalmology. St. Louis: Mosby.\r\n\r\nGottschalk, L., Kluckhohn, C. and Angell, R. 1945. Use of personal documents in history, anthropology, and sociology. Bulletin 53. New York: Social Science Research Council.\r\n\r\nGottschalk, L., Kluckhohn, C.and Angell, R. 1951. Use of personal documents in history, anthropology, and sociology. New York: Social Science Research Council.\r\n\r\nHeller, M. and Schiff, W. (Eds.). 1991. The psychology of touch. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.\r\n\r\nHempel, C. 1966. Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\nHindley, C. 1982. The nature of development. In J. Borms, H. Hauspie, A. Sand, C. Suzanne and M. Hebbelinck (Eds.), Human growth and development.. Pp. 675-684. New York: Plenum.\r\n\r\nHolt, J. Mind of a rock. New York Times magazine. Nov. 18, 2007.\r\n\r\nJurmain, R., Nelson, H., Kilgore, L. and Trevathan, W. 1999. Introduction to physical anthropology (8th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth\r\n\r\nMagnusson, D. and Casaer, P. 1993. Longitudinal research on individual development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.\r\n\r\nMax, D. 2008. A man of taste. New Yorker, LXXXIV(13), 90, May 12. New York: Conde Nast Publications.\r\n\r\nMayr, E. 1985. How biology differs from the physical sciences. In D. Depew and B. Weber (Eds.), Evolution at a crossroads. Pp. 43-63. Cambridge: MIT Press. P. 50.\r\n\r\nMcDowell, J. 2004. The nervous system and sense organs. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.\r\n\r\nMontagu, M. 1961. An introduction to physical anthropology. Springfield, IL: Thomas.\r\n\r\nMueller, C. 1965. Sensory psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\n\r\nNational Research Council. 1989. Myopia: Prevalence and progression. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.\r\n\r\nOxford Atlas of the World. 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.\r\n\r\nPujol, J., Seriano-Mas, C., Ortiz, H., Sebastian-Gallas, N., Lorilla, J. M. and Deus, J. 2006. Myelination of language-related areas in the developing brain. Neurology, 66(3), 339-343.\r\n\r\nRudner, R. 1966. Philosophy of social science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\n\r\nSalkind, N. 1985. Theories of human development (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.\r\n\r\nShepard, R. 1987. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323.\r\n\r\nSouthall, J. 1937. Introduction to physiological optics. London: Oxford. 1961. New York: Dover. (n.d.) New York: Peter Smith.\r\n\r\nSwanston, M. and Wade, N. 1991. Visual perception. London: Routledge.\r\n\r\nThomas, A. and Chess, S. 1980. The dynamics of psychological development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.\r\n\r\nTortora, G. and Anagnostakos, N. 1981. Principles of anatomy and physiology. New York: Harper & Row.\r\n\r\nVon Wright, G. (1951). A treatise on induction and probability. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1960. Paterson, NJ: Littlefield.\r\n\r\nWade, C. and Tavris, C. 1993. Psychology (3rd Ed.). New York: HarperCollins.\r\n\r\nWike, E. 1971. Data analysis. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.\r\n\r\nWohlwill, J. 1973. The study of behavioral development. New York: Academic. P. 47.\r\n\t\r\nWolsk, D. 1967. Chemical sensitivity. In M. Alpern, M. Lawrence and D. Wolsk (Eds.), Sensory processes. Pp. 102-123. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.\r\n" relation_type: [] relation_uri: [] reportno: ~ rev_number: 20 series: ~ source: ~ status_changed: 2009-12-31 14:59:51 subjects: - percep-cog-psy succeeds: ~ suggestions: ~ sword_depositor: ~ sword_slug: ~ thesistype: ~ title: "An Apparent Order of Sensory Ability Changes in Human Beings \r\n" type: preprint userid: 9708 volume: ~