?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rft.title=Scientific+Methods+Must+Be+Public%2C+and+Descriptive+Experience+Sampling+Qualifies&rft.creator=Piccinini%2C+Dr.++Gualtiero&rft.subject=Philosophy+of+Mind&rft.description=Hurlburt+and+Schwitzgebel%E2%80%99s+groundbreaking+book%2C+Describing+Inner+Experience%3A+Proponent+Meets+Skeptic%2C+examines+a+research+method+called+Descriptive+Experience+Sampling+(DES).++DES%2C+which+was+developed+by+Hurlburt+and+collaborators%2C+works+roughly+as+follows.++An+investigator+gives+a+subject+a+random+beeper.++During+the+day%2C+as+the+subject+hears+a+beep%2C+she+writes+a+description+of+her+conscious+experience+just+before+the+beep.++The+next+day%2C+the+investigator+interviews+the+subject%2C+asks+for+more+details%2C+corrects+any+apparent+mistakes+made+by+the+subject%2C+and+draws+conclusions+about+the+subject%E2%80%99s+mind.++Throughout+the+book%2C+Schwitzgebel+challenges+some+of+Hurlburt%E2%80%99s+specific+conclusions.++Yet+both+agree+%E2%80%93+and+so+do+I+%E2%80%93+that+DES+is+a+worthy+method.+&rft.date=2010-03-22&rft.type=Preprint&rft.type=PeerReviewed&rft.format=application%2Fpdf&rft.identifier=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F6835%2F1%2FScientific_Methods_Must_Be_Public.pdf&rft.identifier=++Piccinini%2C+Dr.+Gualtiero++(2010)+Scientific+Methods+Must+Be+Public%2C+and+Descriptive+Experience+Sampling+Qualifies.++%5BPreprint%5D+++++&rft.relation=http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F6835%2F<script src='//archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>