---
abstract: 'The study focused on the comparative analysis of energy cost and gait efficiency between a below knee (BK) amputee and a reference subject (without amputation). It also attempted to indicate the specific feature responsible for a controlled gait with optimum energy cost for BK amputees. Selection criteria of the subjects were similar physical parameters and quality of life studied with WHOQOL-100 quality of life assessment. A CosmedŽ k4 b2 Respiratory Analyzer system was used for the measurement of Oxygen Uptake (VO2), Energy Expenditure per minute (EE) and Heart Rate (HR). Gait efficiency (p < 0.0002) was found higher for BK amputee than normal subject. The therapeutic activities and mainly walking rhythm contributed to improve the mobility & balance. This ensures the optimum time & co-ordination of movements and hence improves the gait efficiency for the BK amputee. Comparison with control group was performed to validate the data.'
altloc:
- http://www.ojhas.org/issue35/2010-3-14.htm
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id:
- durbadal.bme@gmail.com
- ~
- ~
- ~
creators_name:
- family: Biswas
given: Durbadal
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Roy
given: Sukumar
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Lenka
given: PK
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
- family: Kumar
given: Ratnesh
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 2010-10-15
date_type: published
datestamp: 2010-11-22 14:19:28
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/71/17
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: 0
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id:
- Kakkilaya BS
editors_name:
- family: Kakkilaya
given: Srinivas
honourific: Dr.
lineage: ''
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 7117
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/7117/1/2010%2D3%2D14.pdf
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: Energy Cost; Gait Efficiency; Below knee amputee
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:57:48
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: 3
pagerange: ~
pubdom: TRUE
publication: Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences
publisher: Dr. B.S. Kakkilaya
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: "1.\tSutherland DH, Olshen R, Cooper L et al. The Development of Mature Gait. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1980;62:336-353.\r\n2.\tFisher SV, Gullickson G. Energy cost of ambulation in health and disability: A literature review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978;59:124-133. \r\n3.\tGanguli S, Datta SR, Chatterjee BB, et al. Performance evaluation of amputee-prosthesis system in below-knee amputees. Ergonomics. 1973;16:797. \r\n4.\tGonzalez EG, Corcoran PJ, Reyes RL. Energy expenditure in below-knee amputees: Correlation with stump length. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1974;55:111-119. \r\n5.\tHuang CT, Jackson JR, Moore NB, Fine PR, Kuhlemeier KV, Traugh GH. Amputation. Energy cost of ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60:18-24. \r\n6.\tMolen NH. Energy-speed relation of below-knee amputees walking on a motor-driven treadmill. Int Z Angrew Physiol. 1973;31:173-185. \r\n7.\tNielsen DH, Shurr DG, Golden JC, Meier K. Comparison of energy cost and gait efficiency during ambulation in below-knee amputees using different prosthetic feet-A preliminary report. J Prosthet Orthot. 1988;1:24-31. \r\n8.\tWaters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: The influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1976;58:42-46. \r\n9.\tWaters RL, Perry J, Chambers R. Energy expenditure of amputee gait. In: Moore WS, Malone JM, eds. Lower Extremity Amputation. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1989:250-260.\r\n10.\tJames, U.: Oxygen Uptake and Heart Rate During Prosthetic Walking in Healthy Male Unilateral Above-Knee Amputees. Scand. J Rehabil. 1973;5:71-80.\r\n11.\tTraugh GH, Corcoran PJ, Reyes R.L. Energy Expenditure of Ambulation in Patients with Above-Knee Amputations. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1975;56:67-71.\r\n12.\tPagliarulo MA, Waters R, Hislop HJ. Energy Cost of Walking of Below-Knee Amputees Having no Vascular Disease. Phys. Ther. 1979;59:538-542.\r\n13.\tWHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the Assessment Orley & Kuyken, 1994; Szabo, 1996; WHOQOL Group 1994a, 1994b, 1995).\r\n14.\tBuckley JG, Spence WD, Solomonidis SE. Energy cost of walking: comparison of \"intelligent prosthesis\" with conventional mechanism. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.\r\n15.\tNielsen DH, Shurr DG, Golden JC, Meier K. Comparison Of Energy Cost And Gait Efficiency During Ambulation In Below-Knee Amputees Using Different Prosthetic Feet-A Preliminary Report. Journal of Prosthetics & Orthotics October 1988;1(1):24-31\r\n16.\tVanSwearingen JM, Perera S, Brach JS, Cham R, Rosano C, Studenski SA. A Randomized Trial of Two Forms of Therapeutic Activity to Improve Walking: Effect on the Energy Cost of Walking. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009;64A:1190-1198."
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 21
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2010-11-22 14:19:28
subjects:
- OJHAS
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: 'Energy Cost and Gait Efficiency of Below-Knee Amputee and Normal Subject with Similar Physical Parameters & Quality of Life: A Comparative Case Study'
type: journale
userid: 4338
volume: 9