TY  - GEN
ID  - cogprints754
UR  - http://cogprints.org/754/
A1  - Muter, Paul
A1  - Maurutto, Paula
Y1  - 1991///
N2  - Past research has demonstrated that reading efficiency is lower from standard computer displays of the 1980s than from paper. In the present experiments, subjects read or skimmed stories, sometimes from a high-quality CRT (cathode ray tube) and sometimes from a book. Skimming was 41% slower from the CRTs than from the book. Possible reasons for this finding are discussed. Reading speed and comprehension were equivalent for the high-quality CRTs and the book. The paperless office may be imminent after all.
TI  - Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: The paperless office revisited?
SP  - 257
AV  - public
EP  - 266
ER  -

<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/archive-bar.js'></script>
<script src='https://archive-bar.soton.ac.uk/google-analytics.js'></script>