---
abstract: "In this comment, it is argued that the experiments by Cunningham, Healy, Till, Fendrich, and Dimitry (1993) do not constitute failures to replicate Muter's (1980) finding of very rapid forgetting and do not undermine the conclusion of more rapid forgetting from primary memory than had previously been estimated. In Cunningham et al.'s experiments, expectancy of recall after a filled retention interval, a crucial variable in very rapid forgetting, was more than an order of magnitude higher than in Muter's experiments, and the distracting task was substantially easier."
altloc:
- http://psych.utoronto.ca/~muter/Abs1995.htm
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Muter
given: Paul
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 1995
date_type: published
datestamp: 1999-02-17
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/07/96
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 796
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/796/1/Abs1995.htm
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'memory, forgetting, consciousness, short-term memory, primary memory'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:17
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: 3
pagerange: 383-386
pubdom: FALSE
publication: Memory & Cognition
publisher: ~
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: ~
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:34:28
subjects:
- cog-psy
- cog-psy
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: 'Very rapid forgetting: Reply to Cunningham, Healy, Till, Fendrich, and Dimitry'
type: journalp
userid: 393
volume: 23