---
abstract: "Shows that agreeing with Folger's (1989) methodological observations does not mean that it is incorrect to use significance tests. This contention is based on the dynamics of theory corroboration, with reference to which the following distinctions are illustrated, namely, the distinctions between (a) statistical hypothesis testing, theory corroboration, and syllogistic argument, (b) a responsible experimenter and a cynical experimenter, (c) logical validity and methodological correctness, and (d) warranted assertability and truth."
altloc:
- http://uregina.ca/~chowsl/folger/REFOLG.htm
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: 'Folger, R. (1989). Significance test and the duplicity of binary decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 155-160.'
confdates: ~
conference: ~
confloc: ~
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Chow
given: Siu L.
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 1989
date_type: published
datestamp: 1999-08-06
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/08/23
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name: []
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 823
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/text_html.png;/823/1/REFOLG.htm
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: Theory corroborationStatistical hypothesis testingModustollensHypothetico-deductiveSignificance tests
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:18
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: 1
pagerange: 161-165
pubdom: FALSE
publication: Psychological Bulletin
publisher: ~
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: ~
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 8
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:34:51
subjects:
- cog-psy
- phil-sci
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: 'Significance Tests and Deduction: Reply to Folger (1989)'
type: journalp
userid: 141
volume: 106