@misc{cogprints8253,
          volume = {11},
          number = {1},
           title = {A Fifty-year challenge in managing drug addiction in Malaysia},
          author = {Abd Rashid  Rusdi  and Noorzurani  Robson  and Muhammad Muhsin Ahad  Zahari  and Mohamad Hussain  Habil},
            year = {2008},
           pages = {3--6},
         journal = {Journal of University of Malaya Medical Centre (JUMMEC)},
             url = {http://cogprints.org/8253/},
        abstract = {The  history  of  substance  abuse  in Malaysia  can  be divided  into  pre-  and  post-independent  era.  In  pre-independence, the main drug of abuse was opium which was initially consumed by immigrants from China who were introduced by the British colonialist to work in 
Malaya. The post-independence era began in the 1960s when  young  adults were  in{\ss} uenced  by  the  ?Hippy? subculture. At this time, consumption patterns changed where more Malays were  involved  in  drug  abuse compared to other ethnic groups (1, 2). 
By  the early 1980s,  the prevalence of drug addiction increased and this increasing trend made the Malaysian government  consider  heroin  addiction  as  a  national threat. The national anti-drug  task  force was  formed to control  traf{\TH} cking and  to rehabilitate addicts who 
were involved in heroin addiction (3). Legislation was introduced where mandatory  death  sentence was implemented  for  those who  smuggled more  than 15 grams  of  heroin. Drug  addicts  found  to  be  positive for  heroin  were  forced  to  undergo  compulsory 
rehabilitation  for  two  years  (4). Nationwide,  up  to 28  government  drug  rehabilitation  centres were established, and at any particular period, each centre accommodated  up  to  500  inmates. Approximately RM50 million a year was spent to run these centres (5). The centres were initially managed on a total abstinence philosophy;  however  this  approach  produced  poor results. The  latest  survey  showed  that 85\%  of  drug addicts  relapsed  after  completing  their  rehabilitation at  these  centres  (4,  6).  In  view  of  the  poor  results, substitute treatment with methadone was introduced recently to these centres (7).One of the visions of the Malaysian government was to create a drug addiction free nation by the year 2015. However, the increasing number of drug addicts has caused  a  surge  in demand for  rehabilitation  centres, resulting in the inability of these centres to cope. For example,  the  number  of  drug  addicts  increased  by 1\% from year 2001 to 2002, but the number of drug addicts detected in year 2003 was 36,996, a 16\% jump from  the  previous  year  (31,893).  Furthermore,  the National Drug Agency reported that 45\% of the cases were repeat addicts. As for distribution of new cases, by ethnic group the Malays constituted 71\%, Chinese 10.6\%  and  Indian  8.2\%. The majority  (70\%) were  in the  socially  and  economically most  productive  age group  (20-39  years)  and  almost  98\%  of  the  addicts who occupied these rehabilitation centres were male. Currently, the number of drug users in the country is estimated to be 250,000 but the number is predicted to  reach  half  a million  by  year  2015  (3,  8-10). The resulting economic,human resource and social loss is not quanti{\TH} able as the vacuum left by these people in various employment sectors are currently being {\TH} lled by migrant workers. Thus, it is evident that the increasing trend in drug addiction poses a threat to the future of the nation (1, 6, 9).}
}