---
abstract: |
Abstract Many anticipatory systems cannot in
themselves act meaningfully or represent
intentionally. This stems largely from the derivative
nature of their functionality. All current artificial
control systems, and many living systems such as
organs and cellular parts of organisms derive any
intentionality they might have from their designers
or possessors. Derivative functionality requires
reference to some external autonomously functional
system, and derivative intentionality similarly
requires reference to an external autonomous
intentional system. The importance of autonomy
can be summed up in the following slogan: No
meaning without intention; no intention without
function; no function without autonomy. This paper
develops the role of autonomy to show how learning
new tasks is facilitated by autonomy, and further by
representational capacities that are functional for
autonomy.
altloc:
- http://www.kli.ac.at/personal/collierpdf/CASYS98.pdf
chapter: ~
commentary: ~
commref: ~
confdates: August 1998
conference: CASYS 1998
confloc: 'Liege, Belgium'
contact_email: ~
creators_id: []
creators_name:
- family: Collier
given: John
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
date: 1999
date_type: published
datestamp: 2002-06-21
department: ~
dir: disk0/00/00/09/78
edit_lock_since: ~
edit_lock_until: ~
edit_lock_user: ~
editors_id: []
editors_name:
- family: Dubois
given: Daniel
honourific: ''
lineage: ''
eprint_status: archive
eprintid: 978
fileinfo: /style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png;/978/3/CASYS98.pdf
full_text_status: public
importid: ~
institution: ~
isbn: ~
ispublished: pub
issn: ~
item_issues_comment: []
item_issues_count: 0
item_issues_description: []
item_issues_id: []
item_issues_reported_by: []
item_issues_resolved_by: []
item_issues_status: []
item_issues_timestamp: []
item_issues_type: []
keywords: 'autonomy, function, intentionality, meaning, anticaptory systems'
lastmod: 2011-03-11 08:54:23
latitude: ~
longitude: ~
metadata_visibility: show
note: ~
number: ~
pagerange: 75-81
pubdom: FALSE
publication: ~
publisher: Springer-Verlag
refereed: TRUE
referencetext: |-
1. Dennett, D.C., The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press, 1987.
2. Dretske, F., “Machines and the Mental,” Proceedings
and Addresses of the APA 59: 23-33 (1985).
3. Searle, J., “Minds, Brains and Programs,” Behavioral
and Brain Sciences 3,: 417-58 (1980).
4. Searle, J., The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press, 1992.
5. Churchland, P.F. (1996). The Engine of Reason, The
Seat of the Soul. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bickhard, M.H., “Representational Content in Humans
and Machines,” Experimental and Theoretical
Artificial Intelligence 5, 285-333 (1993).
7. Bickhard, M. H. and Terveen, L.. Foundational Issues in
Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science: Impasse
and Solution. New York: Elsevier, 1995.
8. Christensen, W.D., “A Complex Systems Theory of
Teleology,” Biology and Philosophy 11: 301-320
(1996).
9. Christensen, W.D., Collier, J.D. and Hooker, C.A.,
“Adaptiveness and Adaptation: A New Autonomy-theoretic
Analysis and Critique,” Biology and
Philosophy (submitted).
10. Wright, L., “Functions,” Philosophical Review 82, 139-
168 (1973).
11. Millikan, R.G., “In Defense of Proper Functions,”
Philosophy of Science 56, 288-302 (1989).
12. Neander, K., “Functions As Selected Effects: The
Conceptual Analyst’s Defense,” Philosophy of Science,
58, 168-184 (1991).
13. Christensen, W.D. and Hooker, C.A., “Autonomous
Systems and Self-Directed Heuristic Policies: Toward
New Foundations for Intelligent Systems,” Hayes, B.,
Heath, R. , Heathcote A., and Hooker, C.A. (eds),
Proceedings of the Fourth Australian Cognitive Science
Conference, Newcastle, Australia, 1997.
14. Foss, J., “On the Evolution of Intentionality as Seen
from the Intentional Stance,” Inquiry 37: 287-310
(1994).
15. Collier, J. D., “Supervenience and reduction in
biological hierarchies,” M. Matthen and B. Linsky
(eds) Philosophy and Biology: Canadian Journal of
Philosophy Supplementary Volume 14, 209-234 (1988).
16. Maturana, H and Varella, F., Autopoiesis and
Cognition. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1980.
17. Carani, P., “Emergence and Artificial Life’, C.G.
Langton, J.D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (eds) Artificial
Life II, SFI Studies in Complexity, vol 10. Addison-Wesley,
1991, 775-797.
18. Carani, P., “To Evolve and Ear,” Systems Research 10,
19-33 (1993).
19. Peirce, C.S., Collected Papers, edited by Charles
Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Cambridge University
Press, 1960.
20. Dretske, F., Knowledge and the Flow of Information.
MIT Press, 1981.
relation_type: []
relation_uri: []
reportno: ~
rev_number: 12
series: ~
source: ~
status_changed: 2007-09-12 16:35:57
subjects:
- bio-behav
- cog-psy
- phil-mind
succeeds: ~
suggestions: ~
sword_depositor: ~
sword_slug: ~
thesistype: ~
title: 'Autonomy in Anticipatory Systems: Significance for Functionality, Intentionality and Meaning'
type: confpaper
userid: 692
volume: ~