{"id":1140,"date":"2012-09-20T09:09:50","date_gmt":"2012-09-20T09:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/?p=1140"},"modified":"2013-01-10T09:57:57","modified_gmt":"2013-01-10T09:57:57","slug":"introducing-a-connected-island-how-the-iron-curtain-affected-archaeologists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/small-grants\/1140","title":{"rendered":"sotonDH small grant: Introducing \u2018A Connected Island?\u2019: how the Iron Curtain affected Archaeologists"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>After the Second World War the Iron Curtain sliced through the very centre of Europe forming a very real divide in both political and daily lives. In the second half of the 20th century the Soviet regime introduced a new structure to the academic institutions to countries like Poland, Hungary and former Czechoslovakia, including restrictions on contacts with the Western world and ideological pressure previously unknown in these parts of Europe. How did this situation affect researchers on both sides? Was Central European Academia really isolated from western influences? A new project funded by SotonDH aims to address this issue using Palaeolithic archaeology as a case study. In \u2018A connected island? Evaluating influence and isolation of Central European Palaeolithic researchers during communism\u2019 ACRG members Iza Romanowska<\/a> and Tom Brughmans<\/a> combine a traditional historiography with novel citation network analysis techniques to approach this issue from a new angle.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n A heated debate has been taking place in Central European archaeology in the last two decades regarding the issue of isolation (or the lack thereof) from western influences during the second half of the 20th century. Difficulties related to obtaining the necessary passports and visas, the disparity in the values of currencies, and only limited formal international links between research institutions restricted research visits, data collection, literature review, and conference attendance. Equally hindering was the limited circulation of Western archaeological journals within the Soviet Bloc countries, and restricted accessibility to archaeological publications in general. This could have been further aggravated by language barriers and, to some extent, different disciplinary interests. All this does not necessarily mean that Central European researchers were completely unaware of what was happening in the West, as if living on an island unconnected to the rest of the world and immune to external influences.<\/p>\n It is difficult to quantitatively determine to what degree these limitations affected Central European researchers. The project team argues that citation data might allow (at least in part) for such a quantitative evaluation. When a researcher cites the work of another scholar they express in a very formalised way that they were influenced by this person. Citations are like handy proxies for tracing lines of knowledge dissemination and academic influence, obviously not fully representative for these very complex processes, but well suited to quantify the \u2018awareness\u2019 of other peoples research.<\/p>\n \u2018A connected island?\u2019 will collect and explore citation data for Central European Stone Age studies, a relatively small but highly international research field that forms a well-defined case-study suitable for quantitative analysis. The project will initially focus on the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic of Poland, former Czechoslovakia and Hungary. The citation behaviour of scholars working in these countries will be confronted with that of Western European Palaeolithic researchers. The proposed project therefore aims to explore the degree of interaction and academic influence between Central and Western European researchers in Lower and Middle Palaeolithic archaeology during communism (1945-1989) through citation network analysis, in order to evaluate the hypothesis that Central European researchers worked in strong academic isolation.<\/p>\nIsolated or not?<\/h2>\n