Figure 3: Donn’s representation of Dartmoor, with 250 m contour highlighted. The moor outline does not follow this or any other single contour consistently. Elevation data from SRTM (CGIAR-CSI 2013).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nClare and I have produced a gazetteer of libel performance, and complemented it with historical data that relates each of the ten cases to their broader geographical settings. We were also kindly provided historical route data by the Records of Early English Drama (REED). Brought together in a geodatabase, they provide an integrated resource for the colocation and overlay of the various datasets.<\/p>\n
My time spent on this project marked the first time I participated in primary research that aimed to combine historical data with geographical information. Being an archaeologist, specifically a prehistorian, I am relatively inexperienced with the use of historical and documentary sources to inform interpretations of life in the past. My methodological area of interests, however, lie firmly within approaches that seek to understand the spatiality of human culture \u2013 at the most basic level seeking answers to where things are and finding meaning in their locations. This outlook emphasizes the production of place, the agency of people acting within a defined field of action, and introduces space itself as an integral component or actor in human society. With respect to the performance of libel in early modern England, both Clare and I share this interest and invariably, rigorous spatial research necessitates digital research methods and technical know-how.<\/p>\n
Digital research can be seen as both a process and as an end unto itself. In archaeological and anthropological research it is an oft-repeated line that geographical information systems serve primarily to produce \u201cpretty pictures\u201d, this exact phrase having even been worked into some noteworthy tomes on the subject (Maschner et al. 1996). This underplays the value of (digital) data as an end-product. Whether the truism is valid or not, empirical data lies behind the output of a given project, largely independent of its potential visual appeal. Constructing a database from information that would traditionally be acquired from close readings of texts can be seen as an improvement over the qualitative handling of the same information by an individual researcher. This includes its relative ease of dissemination as a geographical resource, meaning both the aforementioned affordances of GIS as an image production engine and the ease of transferral of the geodatabase itself as a shareable, modifiable and extendable entity.<\/p>\n
Finally, as a process, it should be relatively uncontroversial to suggest that finding common ground and overcoming differences in academic vocabularies or outlook are two of the most formidable challenges to interdisciplinary research. From my own point of view, one of the most rewarding aspects of the entire endeavour was developing and maintaining a rapport over Clare\u2019s vision for the project. Limitations have to be communicated, but overall the outstanding lesson is that opportunities abound in the cross-pollination of disciplines. I hope to have helped achieve an ever so small step towards a \u2018spatial turn\u2019 in the study of early modern English literature.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This brief post aims to communicate and evaluate the outcomes of my participation on Clare Egan\u2019s project within the sotonDH framework. I will characterize the spatial data produced as a result, as well as offer a reflective account of my experiences collaborating with another researcher in a different Humanities discipline. Clare has previously detailed the raison d\u2019etre of the project …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80253,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[198239],"tags":[306198,449320],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2806"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/80253"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2806"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2806\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2815,"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2806\/revisions\/2815"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/digitalhumanities.soton.ac.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}