{"id":159,"date":"2018-12-23T15:57:08","date_gmt":"2018-12-23T15:57:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/?p=159"},"modified":"2018-12-23T15:57:08","modified_gmt":"2018-12-23T15:57:08","slug":"why-are-some-functions-felt-rather-than-just-functed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/2018\/12\/23\/why-are-some-functions-felt-rather-than-just-functed\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Are Some Functions Felt Rather Than Just &#8216;Functed&#8217;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote>\n<hr>\n<p><b>SUMMARY: <\/b><i> My own approach to both the problem of Consciousness and the problem of Free Will stands apart, I believe, in equating consciousness <\/i>completely<i> with feeling, in subsuming the free-will problem under the more general problem of the causal role of feeling, and in arguing, unequivocally, that the mind\/body problem (which is in reality the feeling\/function or feeling\/doing problem) &#8212; namely, &#8216;why and how are some functions felt rather than merely &#8220;functed&#8221;?&#8217; &#8212; is insoluble except on pain of telekinetic dualism (hence that Turing-Testing is the only proper (indeed, the only possible) methodology for the cognitive sciences that aspire to explain our cognitive &#8212; i.e., doing &#8212; capacity).<\/p>\n<p>It makes it rather simple to weigh one&#8217;s own position relative to that of others if one &#8220;travels lightly&#8221; like this. (It prevents having to keep reading &#8212; and referring others &#8212; to chapter and verse in order to get to the heart of the matter!) I feel rather like a snail, carrying his small earthly wares on his back, for all to see!  <\/i><\/p>\n<hr>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> I don&#8217;t think free will is so much a belief as a sensation: The sensation of doing something voluntarily, rather than by accident or compulsion. That is no more a matter of belief than the fact that an apple tastes sweet is a matter of belief. Hence I doubt it was invented or evolved (e.g., at the hunter-gatherer to farmer transition in our species&#8217; history)! I think the sensation of volition has been there as long as there has been consciousness (and that&#8217;s a long time &#8212; at least as long as there has been a nervous system). Explicit beliefs about freedom vs. determinism are more recent, but there too I doubt it came with the transition to farming, or any other behavioural or conceptual transition; it had more to do with our notions of religion and philosophy, whenever those started to take form &#8212; probably in ancestral childhood &#8220;magical&#8221; thinking and the tales told us by our not-much-less magic-minded elders!. I also think questions about the history, phenomenology and concepts of free well need to be separated from questions about the metaphysics of causality.<\/p>\n<p>I think consciousness is a lot older than thinking about consciousness. But there is a fundamental point latent in this: Being conscious means nothing more nor less &#8212; I choose my words advisedly &#8212; than <i>feeling<\/i> (sentience). Hence of course they were born at the same time!<\/p>\n<p>    http:\/\/cogprints.org\/2460\/<\/p>\n<p>Hence the mind\/body problem is actually the &#8220;feeling\/function problem&#8221; (i.e. &#8220;What is the nature and causal role, if any, of feelings in the physical, functional world?&#8221;)<\/p>\n<p>This should also make it obvious why the problem of feeling and the problem of free will are one and the same (with the free-will version especially limning the crux of the problem, which is one of causality: &#8220;What is the causal role of feeling?&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>Most thinkers on this topic, in contrast, are in fact reflecting upon the origins of certain ideas (&#8220;beliefs&#8221;) we have <i>about<\/i> consciousness. (This is what philosophers have sometimes called &#8220;second order consciousness&#8221; or &#8220;awareness of being aware,&#8221; and they usually end up conflating the two.)<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the history of ideas, not the history of consciousness itself (i.e., of feelings, including the feeling of volition or conation.) Ideation &#8212; i.e., implicit and explicit cognition &#8212; is indeed a bundle of functional capacities that is more recent than sentience, and some of it is indeed unique to the genotype of our verbalising species, and even to the &#8220;memotype&#8221; of our more recent history and culture.<\/p>\n<p>Whether or not a snail feels certainly doesn&#8217;t depend on my definition (any more than whether <i>I<\/i> feel does!): it depends only on whether or not the snail feels.<\/p>\n<p>What one calls &#8220;consciousness&#8221; (or what one calls anything) is indeed a matter of definition, and it is a substantive (indeed radical) point I seem to have made (judging from the degree to which it is misunderstood and\/or rejected by just about everyone!) in insisting that the only way to make sense of &#8220;consciousness&#8221; is to equate it with sentience (the capacity to feel).<\/p>\n<p>But I think my point will be found to be quite correct, if one thinks rigorously about it. Loose talk about consciousness and all its fuzzy synonyms (&#8220;awareness,&#8221; &#8220;intentionality,&#8221; etc.) is all too easy, as one dances around the phenomenology and its hermeneutics instead of facing up to the phenomenon itself, and the true logical, functional and conceptual challenge it poses &#8212; and has always posed.  <\/p>\n<p>The ability to reason is not an attribute of consciousness. It is an attribute of cognition. That&#8217;s a functional capacity (i.e., it&#8217;s something we can <i>do<\/i>).  Computers can do it too: they too can reason. The difference is that they don&#8217;t feel. The feeling\/function problem &#8212; you could also call it the &#8220;feeling\/doing&#8221; problem &#8212; again: How\/why are some (not all) of our functions felt &#8212; rather than just &#8220;functed&#8221;? (Why do we do some things feelingly, rather than just doingly?)<\/p>\n<p>Exercise: Test your evolutionary hypotheses about the functional role of consciousness on <i>that<i> question: How\/why would the things we are able to do consciously not have been identically adaptive if they had been merely functed, rather than felt? (You won&#8217;t be able to solve that problem, and that is the real feeling\/function or feeling\/doing problem; and it <i>includes<i> the free-will problem!)<\/p>\n<p><b>Stevan Harnad<\/b><br \/>\nhref=&#8221;http:\/\/www.ecs.soton.ac.uk\/~harnad\/genpub.html&#8221;&gt;<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.ecs.soton.ac.uk\/~harnad\/genpub.html<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SUMMARY: My own approach to both the problem of Consciousness and the problem of Free Will stands apart, I believe, in equating consciousness completely with feeling, in subsuming the free-will problem under the more general problem of the causal role of feeling, and in arguing, unequivocally, that the mind\/body problem (which is in reality the &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/2018\/12\/23\/why-are-some-functions-felt-rather-than-just-functed\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Why Are Some Functions Felt Rather Than Just &#8216;Functed&#8217;?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3074,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3074"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":160,"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159\/revisions\/160"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}