{"id":24,"date":"2018-07-18T22:07:38","date_gmt":"2018-07-18T21:07:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/?p=24"},"modified":"2018-07-18T22:07:38","modified_gmt":"2018-07-18T21:07:38","slug":"cognitive-dissonance-defending-the-indefensible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/2018\/07\/18\/cognitive-dissonance-defending-the-indefensible\/","title":{"rendered":"Cognitive Dissonance: Defending the Indefensible"},"content":{"rendered":"

Re: \u00a0<\/strong>Commuters Blast Vegan Posters For ‘Forcing Opinions On Others’<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

The absurdity of this indignant and defensive reaction speaks volumes … But unlike smoking and alcoholism, which draw similar reactions when we advise quitting, this is not even a defense of the “freedom of choice” to hurt oneself. It is a defense of the freedom to harm others. This defense of the indefensible against a defense of the defenseless arises from cognitive dissonance: a moral antinomy trying to camouflage itself from itself.<\/p>\n

L’absurdit\u00e9 de cette r\u00e9action indign\u00e9e et d\u00e9fensive en dit long … Mais contrairement au tabagisme et \u00e0 l’alcoolisme, qui suscitent des r\u00e9actions semblables lorsqu’on conseille l\u2019abstention, ces r\u00e9actions ne reposent m\u00eame pas sur la d\u00e9fense de la \u00ablibert\u00e9 du choix\u00bb \u00e0 faire du mal \u00e0 soi-m\u00eame. Il s’agit d’une d\u00e9fense de la libert\u00e9 \u00e0 faire du mal aux autres. Cette d\u00e9fense de l’ind\u00e9fendable contre la d\u00e9fense des sans-d\u00e9fense est g\u00e9n\u00e9r\u00e9e par la dissonance cognitive \u00a0: \u00a0une antinomie morale qui cherche \u00e0 se camoufler de soi-m\u00eame.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Re: \u00a0Commuters Blast Vegan Posters For ‘Forcing Opinions On Others’ The absurdity of this indignant and defensive reaction speaks volumes … But unlike smoking and alcoholism, which draw similar reactions when we advise quitting, this is not even a defense of the “freedom of choice” to hurt oneself. It is a defense of the freedom … <\/p>\n