{"id":632,"date":"2018-12-31T21:56:40","date_gmt":"2018-12-31T21:56:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/?p=632"},"modified":"2018-12-31T21:56:40","modified_gmt":"2018-12-31T21:56:40","slug":"on-monarchism-and-morality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/2018\/12\/31\/on-monarchism-and-morality\/","title":{"rendered":"On Monarchism and Morality"},"content":{"rendered":"

As a Canadian and British citizen (left-leaning), I am sentimentally and aesthetically a royalist, as long as the royals conduct themselves in a way that is aesthetically and ethically positive (and not too much public money is spent on them). <\/p>\n

A monarch with a historic pedigree can, like a flag or soil, be a more palpable symbol for a populace to identify with, and take heart in (especially in hard times) than an appointed or elected figurehead. (My native Hungary’s current presidential fiasco is a case in point.)<\/p>\n

But nothing excuses a monarch who is old enough to know better<\/a> from going out and wantonly shooting elephants (whether or not his people are groaning under a heavy financial yoke).<\/p>\n

If the British royals ever did anything like that today, I would immediately become a republican. <\/p>\n

(I’m rather afraid that if I took a closer look at current royals’ domestic hunting, I might already become as anti-sovereignist, with reason, as the separatists [ironically calling themselves “sovereignists”] among my fellow-quebeckers already are, without reason, alongside Canadian and Australian republicans, likewise without reason.) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As a Canadian and British citizen (left-leaning), I am sentimentally and aesthetically a royalist, as long as the royals conduct themselves in a way that is aesthetically and ethically positive (and not too much public money is spent on them). A monarch with a historic pedigree can, like a flag or soil, be a more … <\/p>\n