{"id":864,"date":"2019-01-01T13:55:22","date_gmt":"2019-01-01T13:55:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/?p=864"},"modified":"2019-01-01T13:55:22","modified_gmt":"2019-01-01T13:55:22","slug":"pragmatic-abolitionism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/2019\/01\/01\/pragmatic-abolitionism\/","title":{"rendered":"Pragmatic Abolitionism"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>I\u2019m an abolitionist, but most people are still fur-wearing meat-eaters. So the reason fur is a good one for activists to concentrate on first is that \u2014 unlike meat-eating, which many people still believe (wrongly) to be necessary for their health, and animal research, which many people believe (mostly wrongly) to be necessary to save lives \u2014 everyone knows that fur is not necessary for their health; nor does it save lives. So that\u2019s the strongest entry point for awakening them to the horrors they are supporting and sustaining for no vital reason. Once they see that, then the next step is the evidence that meat is not necessary for their health. And after that, the evidence that much (though not all) animal research is just curiosity- or career-driven, not life-saving. There\u2019s no way to get most people to see all of that at once.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I\u2019m an abolitionist, but most people are still fur-wearing meat-eaters. So the reason fur is a good one for activists to concentrate on first is that \u2014 unlike meat-eating, which many people still believe (wrongly) to be necessary for their health, and animal research, which many people believe (mostly wrongly) to be necessary to save … <\/p>\n