{"id":967,"date":"2019-01-02T23:47:53","date_gmt":"2019-01-02T23:47:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/?p=967"},"modified":"2019-01-02T23:47:53","modified_gmt":"2019-01-02T23:47:53","slug":"orders-of-magnanimity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/generic.wordpress.soton.ac.uk\/skywritings\/2019\/01\/02\/orders-of-magnanimity\/","title":{"rendered":"Orders of Magnanimity"},"content":{"rendered":"

Of course multibillionnaire Mark Zuckerberg<\/a> is orders of magnitude more ethical to contribute 99% of his $45B wealth to the planet\u2019s needs and needy rather than to keep it all for himself. But reserving $440M for one multimillionaire child is not exactly altruism either. 1% of that ($4.4M) would stll have left little Max extremely well off for life, and far better off than 99.99% of the planet. <\/p>\n

(That said, if he does as he has promised, MZ will nevertheless become the most magnanimous of multibillionaires today — and perhaps ever…)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Of course multibillionnaire Mark Zuckerberg is orders of magnitude more ethical to contribute 99% of his $45B wealth to the planet\u2019s needs and needy rather than to keep it all for himself. But reserving $440M for one multimillionaire child is not exactly altruism either. 1% of that ($4.4M) would stll have left little Max extremely … <\/p>\n