These would be two courses that I think would link well with your wonderful Portus course.
]]>And as I have mentioned in previous posts and on twitter and the platform, you really have to be involved in one to appreciate the process and in particular the generosity of the learning community (educators and learners and everyone else involved). A big positive in turn is that it would feel really churlish, and dumb, to then forget about all of that in other aspects of university life. Again, I have been slow to practice what I preach in terms of open data and open publication but things are moving quicker and quicker now. I think the multiple layers of open learning and research that are becoming more and more entwined are getting really exciting now, and the pioneers are being very gracious about it.
I would be really happy if within a year I could see the Archaeology of Portus content embedded in learning in all sorts of contexts, and equally I will be encouraging my own students to bring courses from elsewhere to their own experiences. So in a year’s time you might be doing a course on Hadrian’s Wall, and then seamlessly skip in Portus and back out to a course on Latin and it might work. It might be a confusing mess to begin with but by providing linear routes alongside different learning styles can be supported. Similarly I really hope that the course takes on a life of its own through the additional activities and ideas spread via this blog.
If you have a chance to watch Rome’s Lost Empire on BBC 4 on Saturday feedback how you would want the course and the programme to interact in the future. Thanks again for the comment. Graeme
]]>