Preserv

       
Latest...
Array
Preserv 2 final report 'candid and realistic'
The final report from the Preserv 2 project has been described by the JISC programme manager responsible for funding the project, Neil Grindley, as ”candid and realistic about the ... more
Project Partners

Oxford University Library Services ECS, University of Southampton The National Archives
Project Advisors
The British Library
Funded By
JISC

PRESERV 2 is funded by JISC within its capital programme in response to the September 06 call (Circular 04/06), Repositories and Preservation strand

PRESERV was originally funded by JISC within the 4/04 programme Supporting Digital Preservation and Asset Management in Institutions, theme 3: Institutional repository infrastructure development

MORE INFORMATION?

EMAIL: Steve Hitchcock, Project Manager

TEL: +44 (0)23 8059 3256
FAX: +44 (0)23 8059 2865

PRESERV Project,
IAM (Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia) Group,
Department of Electronics & Computer Science,
University of Southampton,
Highfield,
Southampton
SO17 1BJ, UK
RSS Admin


About the ProjectObjectives & OutcomesNews RSSPapers & Presentations RSSPeopleBlogs  RSS
Storage
       

Local disk-based storage

Local disk storage is the most basic and common form of storage. The operating system and overlaying software manage files and file locations on physical disks. The only level of abstraction available at this level is that the disk storage may be presented to the operating system as a single disk even though there may be several disks, e.g. in a RAID configuration. RAID is capable of providing some resilience if monitored closely for failures, but should always be backed up on to tape as most disk-based solutions are located in a single building and room and are thus vulnerable to natural disasters such as fire. Disk storage in general suffers from lack of expandability, especially when the repository will only store objects in a single location on disk and cannot add multiple locations later.

Pros
  • Cheap
  • Available off-the-shelf
  • Some resilience is provided by RAID-based systems
  • Easy to backup and restore
Cons
  • Limited to the storage mechanisms and structures applied by the software and operating system, which can often be difficult to understand
  • Limited access to data other than through the interfaces provided by the software
  • Hard to expand without buying a new solution
  • Limited dynamic resilience and susceptible to natural disasters if based in a single location
<--- Storage options: open storage 4/5 Storage - conclusions and future --->

This page produced and maintained by the PRESERV Project. Contact us