The Hubble Hypothesis and the Developmentalist's Dilemma

Allport. G. W. (1960). The open system in personality

theory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,

61. 301-310.

Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychol-l

ogy: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional

perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Hand-book

of environmen!al psychology (pp. 740). NewYork: Wiley.

American Psychological Association. (1974). Publication

manual of the American Psychological Association

(2nd ed.). Baltimore: Garamond/Pridemark Press.

Anastasi, A. (1958). Differential psychology (3rd ed.).

New York: Macmillan.

Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychologi-cal

research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.

Baldwin, J. M. (1895). Mental development of the child

and the race: Methods and processes. New York:

Macmillan.

Beach, F. A., & Jaynes (1956). Studies of maternal re-trieving

in rats, III: Sensory cues involved in the lac-tating

female’s response to her young. Behaviour, 10,

104-125.

Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (in press). A person-oriented

approach in research on developmental psy-chopathology.

Development and Psychopathology.

Bevan, W. (1991). Contemporary psychology: A tour in-side

the onion, American Psychologist, 46, 475-483.

Bevan, W., & Kessel, F. (1994). Plain truths and home

cooking: Thoughts on the making and remaking of

psychology. American Psychologist, 49, 505-509.

Bhatara, V. S., McMillin, .I M., & Krummer, M. (1995).

Aggressive behavior and fire-setting in a 4-year-old

boy associated with ingestion of ground beef contami-nated

with bovine thyroid tissue: A case report and

review of neuropsychiatric thyrotoxicosis. Journal of

Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 5, 255-

271.

Brandt, L. W. (1973). The physics of the physicist and

the physics of the psychologist. International Journal

of Psychology, 8, 61-72.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human devel-opment:

Experiments by nature and design. Cam-bridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.

Cairns, R. B. 1986). Phenomena lost: Issues in the study

of development. In .I. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual

subject and scientific psychology (p p. 97-l12). New

York: Plenum Press.

Cicchetti, D. (1984). The emergence of developmental

psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 1-7.

Cicchetti, D. (1990). A historical perspective on the disci-pline

of developmental psychopathology. In J. Rolf,

A. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, & S. Wein-traub

(Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the devel-opment

of psychopathology (pp. 2-28). New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Cicchetti, D. (1993). Developmental psychopathology:

Reactions, reflections, and projections. Develop-

Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L.,

Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of

churzce: HOW probability changed science and every-day

life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glymour, C. (1980). Hypothetico-deductivism is hope-less.

Philosophy of Science, 47, 322-325 .

Gould, S. J. (1986). Evolution and the triumph of homol-ogy,

or why history matters. American Scientist, 74,

60-69.

Gould, S. J. (1987). Darwinism defined: Sifting fact from

mental Review, 13, 471-502. theory. Discover, 8, 64-70.

Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Ed%). (1995a). Develop-mermd

psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and methods.

New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds). (1995b). Develop-mental

psychopathology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, und

adaptation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cicchetti, D., & Richters, J. E. (1993). Developmental

psychopathology considerations in the study conduct

disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 33 I-344.

Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and

multifinality in developmental psychopathology. De-velopment

and Psychopathology, 8, 597-600.

Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned so far. American

Psychologist, 45, 1304-I 3 12.

Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American

Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.

Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific

psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.

Edwards, W. (1965). A tactical note on the relation be-tween

scientific and statistical hypotheses. Psycholog-ical

Bulletin, 63, 400-402.

Elasser, W. M. (1966). Atom and organism A new ap-proach

to theoretical biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton

University Press.

Elasser, W. M. (1981). Principles of a new biological the-ory:

A summary. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 89,

131-150.

Emde, R. N. (1994). Individuality, context, and the search

for meaning. Child Development, 65, 719-737.

Estes, W. K. (in press). Significance testing in psycholog-ical

research: Some persisting issues. Psychological

Science.

Evans, C., & McConnell, T. R. (1941). A new measure

of introversion-extroversion. Journal of Psychology,

12, 111-124.

Ferguson, L. (1959). Statistical analysis in psychology

and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Feynman, R. (1986). Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!

New York: Bantam Books.

Fox, R. E. (1996). Charlatanism, scientism, and psycholo-gy’s

social contract. American Psychologist, 51, 777-

784.

Gerstein, D. R., Luce, R. D., Smelser. N. J., & Sperlich,

S. (1988). The behavioral and social sciences:

Achievements and opportunities. Washington, DC:

National Academy Press.Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L.,

Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of

churzce: HOW probability changed science and every-day

life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glymour, C. (1980). Hypothetico-deductivism is hope-less.

Philosophy of Science, 47, 322-325 .

Gould, S. J. (1986). Evolution and the triumph of homol-ogy,

or why history matters. American Scientist, 74,

60-69.

Gould, S. J. (1987). Darwinism defined: Sifting fact from

theory. Discover, 8, 64-70.Guilford, J. P. (1942). Fundamental statistics in psychol- Loftus, G. R. (1991). On the tyranny of hypothesis testing

ogy and education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw- in the social sciences. Contemporary Psychology, 36,

Hill. 102-105.

Herrenkohl, L. R., & Rosenberg, P. A. (1972). Exterocep-tive

stimulation of maternal behavior in the naive rat.

Physiology & Behavior, 8, 595-598.

Hinde, R. A. (1992). Developmental psychology in the

context of other behavioral sciences. Developmental

Psychology, 28, 1018-1029.

Loftus, G. R. (1993). Editorial comment. Memory & Cog-nition,

21, 1-3.

Hinde, R. A., & Dennis, A. (1986). Categorizing individ-uals:

An alternative to linear analysis. International

Journal Behavioral Development, 9, 105-l19.

Horgan, J. (1996). Why Freud isn’t dead. American Sci-entist,

December, 106-l11.

Institute of Medicine. (1989). Research on children and

adolescents with mental, behavioral, and develop-mental

disorders. Washington, DC: National Acad-emy

Press.

Kagan, J. (1992). Yesterday’s premises, tomorrow’s

promises. Developmental Psychology, 28, 990-997.

Kagan, J.. Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1978). In-fancy:

Its place in haman development. Cambridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.

Kaplan, H. B. (1996). Toward an understanding of resil-ience:

A critical review of definitions and models. In

M. D. Glantz, J. Johnson, & L. Huffman (Eds.), Resil-iency

and development: Positive life adaptations.

New York: Plenum Press.

Kavale, K. A., & Fomess, S. R. (1987). The far side of

heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyp-ing

research in learning disabilities. Journal of Learn-ing

Disabilities, 20, 374-382.

Koch, S. (1959). Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3).

New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psycho-logical

research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151-159.

Lykken, D. T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology

anyway? In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.),

Thinking clearly about psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3-39).

Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study

of causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Magnusson, D. (1985). Implications of an interaction-al

paradigm for research on human development. In-temational

Journal of Behavioral Development, 8,

115-137.

Magnusson, D., & Allen, V. L. (1983). Implications and

applications of an interactional perspective for human

development. In D. Magnusson & V. L. Allen (Eds.),

Human development: An interactional perspective

(pp. 369-387). New York: Academic Press.

Magnusson, D., & Bergman, L. (1988). Individual and

variable-based approaches to longitudinal research on

early risk factors. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Studies of psy-chosocial

risk: The power of longitudinal data (pp.

45-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maltz, M. D. (1994). Deviating from the mean: The de-clining

significance of significance. Journal of Re-search

in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 434-436.

Maton, K. I. (1993). A bridge between cultures: Linked

ethnographic empirical methodology for culture-an-chored

research. American Journal of Community

Psychology, 21, 701-121.

Koch, S. (1961). Psychological science versus the science-humanism

antinomy: Intimations of a significant sci-ence

of man. American Psychologist, 16, 629-639.

Koch, S., & Leary, D. E. (Eds.). (1992). A century of

psychology as science. Washington, DC: American

Psychological Association Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions

(2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: Uni-versity

of Chicago Press.

McCord, J. (1993). Descriptions and predictions: Three

problems for the future of criminological research.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30,

412425.

McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowl-edge:

Its implications for innovation and reform in

psychological research. Advances in Experimental .So

cial Psychology, 16, 241.

Lakatos, I. (1977). The methodology of scientific research

programmes :Philosophical papers (Vol. I). J. Wor-ral

& E. G. Zahar (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity

Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction:

A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence.

Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory testing in psychology and

physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of

Science, 34, 103-I 15.

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a

theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of

California at Berkeley.

Leahey, T. H. (1987). A history of psychology: Main car-rents

in psychological thought (2nd ed.). New York:

Prentice-Hall.

Meehl, P. E. (1973). Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers.

Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular aster-isks:

Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of

soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical

Psychology, 46, l-42.

Lerner, R. M., & Kaufman, M. B. (1985). The concept

of development in contextualism. Developmental Re-view,

5, 309-333.

Leventhal, L. (1992). Nudging aside Meehl’s paradox.

Canadian Psychology, 35, 283-298.

Lewin, K. (1931a). The conflict between Aristotelian and

Galilean models of thought in contemporary psychol-ogy.

Journal of General Psychology, 5, 147-117.

Lewin, K. (1931b). Environmental forces in child behav-ior

and development. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A hand-book

of child psychology (2nd ed., pp. 590-625).

Worster, MA: Clark University Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1990). Appraising and amending theories:

The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles

that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry. I, 108-141.

Mitroff, I., & Featheringham, T. (1974). On systematic

problem solving and the error of the third kind. Be-havioral

Science, 19, 383-393.

Morrison, D. E.. & Henkel. R. E. (Eds.). (1970). The sig-nificance

test controversy. Chicago: Aldine.

Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science. New York:

Harcourt, Brace. and World.

National Advisory Mental Health Council. (1990). Na-tional

Plan for Research on Child and Adolescent

Mental Disorders. Rockville, MD: National Institute

of Mental Health.

New York Times. (1990, July 1). Calamities in space. Sec-tion

1. Editorial desk, p. 16.

Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Introduction to statistics in psy-chology

and education. New York: McCraw~Hill.

Overton. W. F. (1984a). World views and their influence

on psychological theory and research: Kuhn-Lakatos-Laudan.

In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child

Development and behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 19 l-225). New

York: Academic Press.

Overton, W. F. (1984b). Comments on Beilin’s epistemol-ogy

and Palermo’s defense of Kuhn. In H. W. Reese

(Ed.). Advances in child development and behavior

(Vol. 18, pp. 273-276) . New York: Academic Press.

Overton, W. F., & Horowitz, H. A. (1991). Develop-mental

psychopathology: Integrations and integra-tions.

In D. Cicchetti & S. Toth (Eds.), Rochester

Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology: Vol.

3. Models and integrations (pp. 142). Rochester,

NY: University of Rochester Press.

Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley: Uni-versity

of California.

Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference: Certain systematic

methods of scientific thinking may produce much more

rapid progress than others. Science, 146, 347-362.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery.

London: Hutchinson.

Popper, K. R. (1991). Of clouds and clocks: An approach

to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man.

In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking

clearly about psychology.(Vol. 1, pp. 100-l39). Min-neapolis,

MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Radke-Yarrow, M., & Sherman, T. (1990). Hard grow-ing:

Children who survive. In J. Rolf, A. Masten, D.

Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.),

Risk and protective factors in the development of psy-chopathology

(pp. 97-l19). New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. Chi-cago:

University of Chicago.

Richters, J. E. (1996). Disordered views of antisocial

children: A late 20th century perspective. In C. Ferris

(Ed.), Understanding aggressive behavior in children.

New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

Richters, J. E.. & Cicchetti, D. (1993a). Editorial: Toward

a developmental perspective on conduct disorder. De-velopment

and Psvchopathology, 5, 1-4.

Richters, J. E., & Cicchetti, D. (1993b). Mark Twain

meets DSM-III-R: Conduct disorder, development.

and the concept of harmful dysfunction. Development

and Psychopathology, 5, 5-29.

Robinson, D. N. (1984). The new philosophy of science:

A reply to Manicas and Secord. American Psyholo-gist,

39, 920-921.

Rorer, L. G. (1991). Some myths of science in psychol-ogy.

In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Ed.). Thinking

clearly about psychology (Vol. 1. pp. 61-87). Minne-apolis,

MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Rozeboom, W. W. (1982). Let’s dump hypothctico-de-ductivism

for the right reasons. Philosophy of Sci-ence,

49, 637-647.

Russell, J. (1990). Causal explanations in cognitive de-velopment.

In G. Butterworth & P. Bryant (Eds.),

Causes of development: Interdisciplinary perspectives

(pp. 111-134). London: Harvester, Wheatsheaf

Hemel Hemstead.

Rutter, M., & Garmery. N. (1983). Developmental psy-chopathology.

In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Carmi-chaels

manual of child psychology: Vol. 4. Social

and personality development (pp. 775-911). New

York: Wiley.

Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the

causal Structure of the world. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

Sameroff, A. (1995). Developmental systems: Contexts

and evolution. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), De-velopmental

psychopathology: Risk, disorder and ad-uptation

(pp. 238-294). New York: Wiley-Intersci-encc.

Sameroff, A. J., & Chandler, M. J. (1975). Reproductive

risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F.

D. Horowitz. M. Hetherington, S. Starr-Salapatek, &

G. Siegel (Eds.), Review of child development re-search

(pp. 187-244). Chicago: University of Chi-cago

Press.

Sarason, S. B. (1981). Psychology misdirected. New

York: The Free Press.

Shadish, W. R. (1995). Philosophy of science and the

quantitative-qualitative debates: Thirteen common er-rors.

Education and Program Planning, I8, 63-75.

Shames, M. L. (1990). On data, methods, and theory: An

epistemological evaluation of psychology. Canadian

Psychology, 31, 229-238.

Smith. P. M., & Torrey. B. B. (1996). The future of the

behavioral and social sciences. Science, 271, 61, 1-612.

Spemann. H. (1938). Embryonic development and induc-tion.

New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Sroufe. L. A., & Rutter, M. (1984). The domain of devel-opmental

psychopathology. Child Development, 83,

173-189.

Thurstone. L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chi-cago:

University of Chicago Press.

Valsiner. J. (Ed.). (1986a). The individual subject and sci-entific psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

Valsiner. J. (1986b). Between groups and individuals:

Psychologists’ and laypersons’ interpretations of cor-relational

findings. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual

Subject and scientific psychology (pp. 113-l52). New

York: Plenum Press.

von Bertalanffy. L. (1968). General system theory. New

York: George Braziller. Inc.

Waddington. C. H. (1957). The strategy of genes . Lon-don:

Allen & Unwin.I