The Mapping between the Mental and the Public Lexicon

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre (1998) The Mapping between the Mental and the Public Lexicon. [Book Chapter]

Full text available as:

[img] HTML


We argue that the presence of a word in an utterance serves as starting point for a relevance guided inferential process that results in the construction of a contextually appropriate sense. The linguistically encoded sense of a word does not serve as its default interpretation. The cases where the contextually appropriate sense happens to be identical to this linguistic sense have no particular theoretical significance. We explore some of the consequences of this view. One of these consequences is that there may be many more mentally represented concepts than there are linguistically encoded concepts.

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:cognition, communication, languge of thought, lexicon, linguistics, mind, philosophy, pragmatics, psychology, relevance, relevance theory
Subjects:Linguistics > Pragmatics
Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
ID Code:2280
Deposited By: Sperber, Dan
Deposited On:18 Jun 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Barsalou, L. (1987). The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.) Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorisation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 101-40.

Butler, K. (1995). Content, context and compositionality. Mind and language 10, 3-24.

Caramazza, A. & E. Grober. (1976). Polysemy and the structure of the subjective lexicon. In C. Rameh (ed.) Semantics: Theory and application. Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics. Washington DC, Georgetown University Press, 181-206.

Carston, R. (1996). Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? University College London working papers in linguistics 8,

Carston, R. (in preparation). Pragmatics and the explicit-implicit distinction. University of London PhD thesis.

Deane, P. (1988). Polysemy and cognition. Lingua 75, 325-61.

Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York, Crowell.

Fodor, J. & E. Lepore. (1996). The emptiness of the lexicon: Critical reflections on J. Pustejovsky's The generative lexicon. RuCCS, Rutgers University,Technical report 27.

Franks, B. (1995). Sense generation: a 'quasi-classical' approach to concepts and concept combination. Cognitive science 19, 441-505.

Franks, B. & N. Braisby. (1990). Sense generation or how to make a mental lexicon flexible. In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Cambridge, MA: MIT, July 1990.

Gelman, S. & E. Markman. (1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition 23, 183-209.

Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Goshke, T. & D. Koppelberg. (1992). The concept of representation and the representation of concepts in connectionist models. In W. Ramsey, S. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds) Philosophy and connectionist theory. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum.

Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Groefsema, M. (1995). 'Can', 'may', 'must' and 'should': A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of linguistics 31, 53-79.

Hardin, C. (1988). Color for philosophers. Hackett.

Lehrer, A. (1990). Polysemy, conventionality and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive linguistics 1-2, 207-46.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Nunberg, G. (1996). Transfers of meaning. In Pustejovsky & Boguraev (eds), 109-132.

Papafragou, A. (in preparation). Modality and the semantics-pragmatics interface. University of London PhD thesis.

Pinkal, M. (1995). Logic and lexicon. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Pustejovsky, J. & B. Boguraev. (eds) (1996). Lexical semantics: The problem of polysemy. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Recanati, F. (1995). The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive science 19, 207-232.

Searle, J. (1980). The background of meaning. In J. Searle & F. Kiefer (eds) Speech-act theory and pragmatics. Dordrecht, Reidel, 221-32.

Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Sperber, D. (1994). Understanding verbal understanding. In J. Khalfa (ed.) What is intelligence? Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 179-98.

Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, Blackwell.

Wilson, D. & D. Sperber. (in press) Pragmatics and time. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds) Relevance theory: Applications and implications. Amsterdam, Benjamins.


Repository Staff Only: item control page