Chow, Dr. Siu L. (2002) Issues in Statistical Inference. [Journal (Paginated)]
Full text available as:
|
PDF
558Kb |
Abstract
The APA Task Force’s treatment of research methods is critically examined. The present defense of the experiment rests on showing that (a) the control group cannot be replaced by the contrast group, (b) experimental psychologists have valid reasons to use non-randomly selected subjects, (c) there is no evidential support for the experimenter expectancy effect, (d) the Task Force had misrepresented the role of inductive and deductive logic, and (e) the validity of experimental data does not require appealing to the effect size or statistical power.
Item Type: | Journal (Paginated) |
---|---|
Keywords: | Statistical inference, Experimental control, Significance tests, Statistical power, Effect size, Experimenter's expectancy effects, Meta-experiment, Meta-analysis, Sample size |
Subjects: | Psychology > Cognitive Psychology Philosophy > Philosophy of Science |
ID Code: | 2892 |
Deposited By: | Chow, Dr. Siu L. |
Deposited On: | 21 Apr 2003 |
Last Modified: | 11 Mar 2011 08:55 |
Commentary/Response Threads
- Chow, Dr. Siu L. Issues in Statistical Inference. (deposited 21 Apr 2003) [Currently Displayed]
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- ASCII Citation
- Atom
- BibTeX
- Dublin Core
- EP3 XML
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- EndNote
- HTML Citation
- ID Plus Text Citation
- JSON
- METS
- MODS
- MPEG-21 DIDL
- OpenURL ContextObject
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- RDF+N-Triples
- RDF+N3
- RDF+XML
- Refer
- Reference Manager
- Search Data Dump
- Simple Metadata
- YAML
Repository Staff Only: item control page