Cogprints

Auotmatic detection, consistent mapping, and training

Chow, Dr Siu L. (1986) Auotmatic detection, consistent mapping, and training. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
 PDF
165Kb

Abstract

Results from two experiments showed that a flat display﷓size function was found under the consistent mapping (CM) condition despite the facts that there was no extensive CM training and that the stimulus﷓response (S﷓R) consistency was only an intrasession manipulation. A confounding factor might be responsible for the fact that the consistent and the varied S﷓R mapping conditions gave rise to different display﷓size functions in Schneider and Shiffrin's (1977) study. Their claim that automatic detection and controlled search are qualitatively different is also discussed.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:Automaticity, attention, S-R mapping, display-size function
Subjects:Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
ID Code:2959
Deposited By: Chow, Dr. Siu L.
Deposited On:19 May 2003
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

BADDELEY, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.

CHENG, P. W. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review, 92, 414﷓423.

DEUTSCH, J. A., & DEUTSCH, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80﷓90.

FISK, A. D., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1983). Category and word search: Generalizing search principles to complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 177﷓195.

POSNER, M. I., & SNYDER, R. R. (1975a). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55﷓85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

POSNER, M. I., & SNYDER, R. R. (1975b). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Domic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 669﷓682). New York: Academic Press.

RYAN, C. (1983). Reassessing the automaticity﷓control distinction: Item recognition as a paradigm case. Psychological Review, 90, 171﷓178.

SCHNEIDER, W., DUMAIS, S. T., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1﷓27). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1﷓66.

SCHNEIDER, W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1985). Categorization (restructuring) and automatization: Two separable factors. Psychological Review, 92, 424﷓428.

SHIFFRIN, R. M., & GEISLER, W. S. (1973). Visual recognition in a theory of information processing. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 53﷓101). Washington, DC: Winston.

SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127﷓190.

SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1984). Automatic and controlled processing revisited. Psychological Review, 91, 269﷓276.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.