Cogprints

LANGUAGE, PERCEPTION AND ACTION: PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES

Allott, Robin (2001) LANGUAGE, PERCEPTION AND ACTION: PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES. [Book Chapter]

Full text available as:

[img] HTML
85Kb

Abstract

The earlier part of this book has been concerned with very specific questions arising in the field of linguistics (phonetics, semantics and syntax), with the results of research into visual perception (physiological and neurological) and with rather wider speculation about the organisation of bodily action and the relation between the bodily processes underlying action, vision and speech. The hypotheses, arguments, evidence and conclusions reached have not depended to any significant extent on philosophical doctrine or concepts and the question may be asked why should a book essentially concerned with linguistics conclude with a chapter devoted to philosophy. To this question there is a broad answer and a more specific one; the broad answer is that there has been prolonged and difficult discussion between philosophers over many centuries of the subjects dealt with earlier in this book, the origin and nature of language, the relation of language to reality, perception as based on sense-experience and providing the main basis for veridical knowledge, and voluntary human action (the notions of free will and determinism, of reasons and causes of action). The narrower answer, as an occasion and justification for having a philosophical chapter, is that in some respects totally new broad and specific hypotheses are presented about the functioning of language, perception and action, and particularly about their interrelation in human behaviour, and it is worth considering what implications these hypotheses, if true, may have for traditional or current philosophical views. It may be that they ought to involve some radical review of current theory but, in any case, it would be unsatisfactory simply to present a whole range of ideas bearing on language, perception and action without having regard to what relevant to these subjects has been said by philosophers (as in the same way it would be unsatisfactory not to have regard to work that has been done on these subjects by experts in the field of Artificial Intelligence).

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:perception, language origin, epistemology, Merleau-Ponty, Lorenz, motor theory, meaning
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
ID Code:3540
Deposited By: Allott, R M
Deposited On:06 Apr 2004
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Anscombe G.E.M. 1957. Intention. Blackwell.

Austin J.L. 1961. Philosophical Papers. Clarendon Press.

Ayer A.J. 1938. Language, Truth and Logic. Clarendon Press.

Ayer A.J. 1940. The foundations of empirical knowledge. Macmillan.

Ayer A.J. 1956. The Problem of Knowledge. Penguin.

Berkeley George 1710. The Principles of Human Knowledge. (ed. with introduction by G.J. Warnock) Collins Fontana (1972).

Black Max 1954. Metaphor. Aristot. Soc. Proc. 19 54-55

Black Max 1962. Language and Reality. In The Linguistic Turn ed. R. Rorty 1967, 331-339. U. Chicago Press.

Boden Margaret A. 1978. Purposive Explanation in Psychology. Harvester Press, Hassocks.

Carnap Rudolf 1956. Meaning and Necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic. U. Chicago Press.

Chomsky Noam 1968. Language and Mind. Harcourt-Brace.

Craik K.J.W. 1943. The Nature of Explanation. CUP.

Frege G. 1892. Translations from the philosophical writings. eds. T. Geach and M. Black Blackwell (1952).

Gibson J.J. 1950. The Perception of the Visual World. Houghton Mifflin.

Gibson J.J. 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.

Gregory R.L. 1964. Human Perception. Brit. Med. Bull. 20 21-27.

Gregory R.L. 1972. Eye and Brain. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

Gregory R.L. 1974. Concepts and Mechanisms of Perception. Duckworth.

Grice P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66 377-388.

Grice P. 1968. Utterer's meaning, Sentence meaning, and word meaning. Foundations of Language 4 1-18.

Hegel G.W.F. 1807. The Phenomenology of Mind.(trans.J.B. Baillie) Allen & Unwin (1961).

Hume David. 1740. A Treatise of Human Nature. (ed. with introduction by E.C. Mossner) Penguin (1969).

James William 1890. The Principles of Psychology. (Dover 1950.).

Juliard Pierre 1970. Philosophers of Language in 18th century France. Mouton.

Kant Immanuel 1781. Critique of Pure Reason.(trans. F. Max Muller). Anchor (1966).

Katz J.J. 1967. The philosophical relevance of Linguistic Theory. In The Linguistic Turn ed. R. Rorty 1967, 340-355. U. Chicago Press.

Katz J.J. 1972. Semantic Theory. Harper & Row.

Leibniz G.W. 1703. Nouveaux Essais sur l'Entendement Humain.(ed. with Introduction by Jacques Brunschwig). Garnier-Flammarion 1966.

Lewis P.E. 1970. Merleau-Ponty and the phenomenology of language. In Structuralism ed. J. Ehrmann Anchor/Doubleday.

Locke John 1706. An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Dent (1964).

Lorenz Konrad 1977. Behind the Mirror. Methuen.

Lucas J.R. 1970. The Freedom of the Will. Clarendon Press.

Lyons John 1977. Semantics. CUP.

Magee Bryan 1973. Modern British Philosophy. Paladin.

Malinowski B. 1930. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In The Meaning of Meaning, ed. Ogden and Richards. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Merleau-Ponty M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Humanities Press.

Merleau-Ponty M. 1972. La structure du comportement. Presses Universitaires de France.

Monod Jacques 1970. Le hasard et la nécéssité. Editions du Seuil.

Passmore John 1968. A Hundred Years of Philosophy. Penguin.

Polanyi M. 1958. Personal Knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Quine W. V. 1961. From a logical point of view. Harper & Row.

Quine W.V 1968. The inscrutability of reference. In Steinberg and Jakobovits,142-154.

Richards I.A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York and London.

Rorty R. 1967. Metaphilosophical Difficulties of Linguistic Philosophy. Introduction to The Linguistic Turn. .

Rorty R. Trans. 1967. Discussion of Strawson's "Analysis, Science and Metaphysics" at the Royaumont Colloquium In The Linguistic Turn ed. R. Rorty 1967, 321-330.

Rorty R. ed. 1967. The Linguistic Turn. U. Chicago Press.

Royaumont Colloquium 1962. La philosophie analytique. Editions de Minuit.

Royce Josiah 1919. Lectures on Modern Idealism. Yale UP.

Russell B. 1965. The Problems of Philosophy. Thornton Butterworth.

Ryle Gilbert 1949. The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson.

Sayre K.M. 1976. Cybernetics and the Philosophy of Mind. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Searle J.R. 1969. Speech Acts. CUP.

Searle J.R. ed. 1971. The Philosophy of Language. OUP.

Sloman A. 1971. Tarski, Frege and the Liar Paradox. Philosophy April 1971. XLVI 176 133-147.

Steinberg D.D and L.A. Jakobovits eds.1971. Semantics. CUP.

Strawson P.F. 1961. Analysis, Science and Metaphysics. From Proceedings of Royaumont Colloquium. In The Linguistic Turn ed. R. Rorty 1967, 312-320.

Strawson P.F. 1959. Individuals. Methuen.

van Breda P. 1961. Discussion of Strawson's paper: Analysis, Science and Metaphysics. Royaumont Conference. In The Linguistic Turn ed. R. Rorty 1967, 325-7.

Whitehead A.N. and B. Russell 1913. Principia Mathematica. (ed. 1962. CUP).

Wittgenstein L. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Wittgenstein L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell.

Wittgenstein L. 1960. The Blue and Brown Books. Blackwell.

Wittgenstein L. 1961. Notebooks 1914-1916. ed. G.H. von Wright and G.E.M. Anscombe. Blackwell.

Wittgenstein L. 1967. Zettel. Blackwell.

Wittgenstein L. 1974. On Certainty. Basil Blackwell.

Ziff P. 1967. On H.P. Grice's account of meaning.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page