The ontology of signs as linguistic and non-linguistic entities: a cognitive perspective

Kravchenko, Prof. A.V. (2003) The ontology of signs as linguistic and non-linguistic entities: a cognitive perspective. [Book Chapter]

Full text available as:



It is argued that the traditional philosophical/linguistic analysis of semiotic phe-nomena is based on the false epistemological assumption that linguistic and non-linguistic entities possess different ontologies. An attempt is made to show where linguistics as the study of signs went wrong, and an unorthodox account of the na-ture of semiosis is proposed in the framework of autopoiesis as a new epistemology of the living.

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:sign, semiosis, ontology, epistemology
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
Linguistics > Pragmatics
Philosophy > Epistemology
ID Code:4009
Deposited By: Kravchenko, Professor Alexander
Deposited On:28 Dec 2004
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K. & Harnish, R. M. (1990). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S.(2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Bickerton, D. (1990). Language & species. Chicago & London: The University of Chi-cago Press.


Bod, R. (1998). Beyond grammar: An experience-based theory of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Croft, W. (1998). Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (2), 151-173.

Dennett, D. (1996). Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.

Dineva, A. (1994). Some theoretical principles of cognitive linguistics and their applica-tion to the study of the semantics of verbal tenses. Studia Kognitywne 1. Semantyka kategorii aspektu i czasu. Warszawa. 149-159.

Dirven, R. & Verspoor M. (Eds.). (1998). Cognitive exploration of language and lin-guistics. John Benjamins.

Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Basingstoke, etc.: Macmil-lan.

Frumkina, R. M. (1999). Samosoznanije lingvistiki — vchera i zavtra. Izvestija akademii nauk. Serija literatury i jazyka, 58 (4), 28-38 [“Self-awareness of linguis-tics — yesterday and tomorrow.” Newsletter of the Academy of Sciences. Literature and Language Series. Moscow].

Geeraerts, D. (1988). Cognitive grammar and the history of lexical semantics. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 647-677). Amster-dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins..

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.

Grush, R. 1997. The architecture of representation. Philosophical Psychology, 10 (1), 5-23.

Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford University Press.

Keller, R. (1998). A theory of linguistic signs. Oxford University Press.

Kravchenko, A. V. (1996). Jazyk i vosprijatije: Kognitivnyje aspekty jazykovoi kategori-zatsii [Language and perception: Cognitive aspects of linguistic categorization]. Iz-datelstvo Irkutskogo universiteta.

Kravchenko, A. V. (2001a). Kognitivnaja lingvistika i novaja epistemologija. Izvestija Akademii Nauk. Serija literatury i jazyka, 60 (5), 3-13 [Cognitive linguistics and new epistemology. Newsletter of the Academy of Sciences. Literature and language se-ries. Moscow].

Kravchenko, A. V. (2001b). Znak, znachenije, znanije: Ocherk kognitivnoi filosofii jazyka [Sign, meaning, knowledge: An essay in the cognitive philosophy of lan-guage]. Irkutsk.

Kravchenko, A. V. (2002). Cognitive linguistics as a methodological paradigm. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Turewicz (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics today (pp. 41-54).Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical pre-requisites. Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Malinowski, B. (1927). The Problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. 2nd revised edition (Sup-plement I, pp. 296-336). New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.

Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (Eds.). (1999). Concepts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Maturana, H. (1970). Biology of cognition. BCL Research Report 9.0, Urbana, IL: Uni-versity of Illinois.


Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In G. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought (pp. 28-62). New York: Academic Press.

Maturana, H. (1983). On the misuse of the notion of information in biology. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 6, 155-158.

Maturana, H. (1987). Everything said is said by an observer. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia: A way of knowing (pp. 65-82). Hudson, NY: Lindisfarne Press.

Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.

Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of hu-man understanding. Boston: Shambhala.

Moreno, A., Merelo, J. J. & Etxeberria, A. (1992). Perception, adaptation and learning. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis and perception: A workshop with ESPRIT BRA 3352 (pp. 65-70). Dublin.

Murphy, N. (1992). The causal and symbolic explanatory duality as a framework for understanding vision. In B. McMullin & N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis and percep-tion: A workshop with ESPRIT BRA 3352 (pp. 15-25). Dublin.

Nemeth, E. (Ed.). (2001). Cognition in language use (Selected Papers from the 7th In-ternational Pragmatics Conference, Vol. 1). Antwerp: International Pragmatics As-sociation.

Sandra, D. (1998). What linguistics can and can’t tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 361-378.

Saussure, F. de (1916/1922). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot & Cie.

Stich, S. (1992). What is a theory of mental representation? Mind, 101, 243-261.

Turewicz, K. (2000). Applicability of cognitive grammar as a foundation of pedagogi-cal/reference grammar. Lódz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lódzkiego.

Van Valin, R. D. & LaPolla, R. L. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge UP.

Watson, R. A. (1995). Representational ideas: From Plato to Patricia Churchland. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Wilson, D. (1997). Linguistic Structure and Inferential Communication. Paper presented at the 16th International Congress of Linguists. Paris, July 25.

Zvegintsev, V. A. (1996). Mysli o lingvistike [Thoughts about linguistics]. Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.


Repository Staff Only: item control page