Harnad, Stevan (2001) What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? [Book Chapter]
This is the latest version of this eprint.
Full text available as:
HTML
45Kb |
Abstract
Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).
Item Type: | Book Chapter |
---|---|
Keywords: | Searle, Chinese Room Argument, Turing Test, Symbol Grounding, computationalism, cognitivism, robotics, language functionalism, neuroscience |
Subjects: | Psychology > Cognitive Psychology Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence Computer Science > Robotics |
ID Code: | 4023 |
Deposited By: | Harnad, Stevan |
Deposited On: | 06 Jan 2005 |
Last Modified: | 11 Mar 2011 08:55 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? (deposited 19 Jun 2001)
- What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? (deposited 06 Jan 2005) [Currently Displayed]
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- ASCII Citation
- Atom
- BibTeX
- Dublin Core
- EP3 XML
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- EndNote
- HTML Citation
- ID Plus Text Citation
- JSON
- METS
- MODS
- MPEG-21 DIDL
- OpenURL ContextObject
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- RDF+N-Triples
- RDF+N3
- RDF+XML
- Refer
- Reference Manager
- Search Data Dump
- Simple Metadata
- YAML
Repository Staff Only: item control page