Cogprints

The Short Term Memory Structure In State-Of-The Art Recall/Recognition Experiments of Rubin, Hinton and Wentzel

Tarnow, Dr. Eugen (2005) The Short Term Memory Structure In State-Of-The Art Recall/Recognition Experiments of Rubin, Hinton and Wentzel. [Preprint]

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
 PDF
131Kb

Abstract

Properties of a short term memory structure are discovered in the data of Rubin, Hinton and Wenzel (1999): Recall (recognition) probabilities and search times are linearly related through stimulus presentation lags from 6 seconds to 600 (350) seconds. This data suggest that only one memory structure is present in the Rubin, Hinton and Wenzel data. The data also suggest that the memory items have a finite effective size that shrinks to zero in a logarithmic fashion as the time since stimulus presentation increases, away from the start of the search. According to the logarithmic decay, the size of the memory items decreases to a couple of neurons at about 1200 seconds for recall and 350 seconds for recognition – this should be the time scale for a short term memory being converted to a long term memory. The incorrect recall time saturates, suggesting a limited size of the short term memory structure: the time to search through the structure for recall is 1.7 seconds. For recognition the corresponding time is about 0.4 seconds, a non-Sternberg experimental result to compare with the 0.243 seconds given by Cavanagh (1972)).

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:short term memory, reaction time, search time, search speed
Subjects:Neuroscience > Brain Imaging
Neuroscience > Neurology
Neuroscience > Neuroanatomy
ID Code:4670
Deposited By: Tarnow, Dr. Eugen
Deposited On:06 Jan 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Cavanagh, J. Patrick (1972). “Relation Between The Immediate Memory Span And The Memory Search Reate”, Psychological Review, 79, 525- 530.

Cowan, N (1993). “Activation, attention and short term memory”, Mem Cognit. 21(2):162-7.

Cowan, N (2000). “The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity”, BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES 24, 87–185.

Davelaar, E., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H., Usher, M.(2005) The Demise of Short-Term Memory Revisited: Empirical and Computational Investigations of Recency Effects. Psychological Review Vol. 112, No. 1, 3–42.

Eimas. P.D. and D. Zeaman, 1963. Response speed changes in an Estes’ paired-associate ‘miniature’ experiment. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1, 38`4-388.

Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K. & Singer, W. (1989) “Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization, which reflects global stimulus properties. “Nature 338:334–37.

Jensen, O., Lisman, J.E. (1998). “An Oscillatory Short-Term Memory Buffer Model Can Account for Data on the Sternberg Task”. J. Neuroscience, 18, p. 10688-10699.

MacLeod, C., Nelson, T. (1984). Response latency and response accuracy as measures of memory. Acta Psychologica 57, 215-235.

Millward. R.. 1964. Latency in a modified paired associate learning experiment. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 3. 309-316.

Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 384–413.

Pachella, R.G., 1974. ‘The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research’. In: B.H. Kantowitz (ed.), Human information processing: tutorials in performance and cognition. New York: Wiley.

Ratcliff, R. (1978). “A theory of memory retrieval.” Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.

Rodriquez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J.-P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B. & Varela, F. J. (1999) “Perception’s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity.” Nature 397:430–33.

Rubin, D.C., Hinton, S., Wenzel, A., (1999), “The Precise Time Course of Retention”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol 25, No. 5, 1161-1176.

Rubin, D.C., Wenzel, A.E. (1996) “One Hundred Years of Forgetting: A Quantitative Description of Retention”, Psychological Review, Vol 103, No. 4, 743-760.

R. Shadmehr, and T. Brashers-Krug (1997). ”Functional Stages in the Formation of Human Long-Term Motor Memory.” J. Neurosci. 17: 409-419.

E. Tarnow. (2003) “How Dreams and Memory May Be Related”, Neuro-Psychoanalysis 5(2), p. 177.

Thompson, B.C., 1977. The feeling of knowing: decision to terminate the search. Master’s thesis from the University of Houston.

Wickelgren (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.