P-model Alternative to the T-model

Roberts, Mark D. (2004) P-model Alternative to the T-model. [Journal (Paginated)]

This is the latest version of this eprint.

Full text available as:



Standard linguistic analysis of syntax uses the T-model. This model requires the ordering: D-structure $>$ S-structure $>$ LF, where D-structure is the deep structure, S-structure is the surface structure, and LF is logical form. Between each of these representations there is movement which alters the order of the constituent words; movement is achieved using the principles and parameters of syntactic theory. Psychological analysis of sentence production is usually either serial or connectionist. Psychological serial models do not accommodate the T-model immediately so that here a new model called the P-model is introduced. The P-model is different from previous linguistic and psychological models. Here it is argued that the LF representation should be replaced by a variant of Frege's three qualities (sense, reference, and force), called the Frege representation or F-representation. In the F-representation the order of elements is not necessarily the same as that in LF and it is suggested that the correct ordering is: F-representation $>$ D-structure $>$ S-structure. This ordering appears to lead to a more natural view of sentence production and processing. Within this framework movement originates as the outcome of emphasis applied to the sentence. The requirement that the F-representation precedes the D-structure needs a picture of the particular principles and parameters which pertain to movement of words between representations. In general this would imply that there is a preferred or optimal ordering of the symbolic string in the F-representation. The standard ordering is retained because the general way of producing such an optimal ordering is unclear. In this case it is possible to produce an analysis of movement between LF and D-structure similar to the usual analysis of movement between S-structure and LF. It is suggested that a maximal amount of information about a language's grammar and lexicon is stored, because of the necessity of analyzing corrupted data.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Additional Information:I have taken out a lot of the newlines in the references, hope that it works this time... not sure what was wrong with the version that I tried to upload last weekend. I have altered the address, diagrams, and references.
Keywords:T-model, movement, Frege Representation.
Subjects:Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Linguistics > Syntax
ID Code:5432
Deposited By: Roberts, Dr. Mark D.
Deposited On:07 Mar 2007
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Akman, Varol and Surav, Mehmet, Steps Towards Formalizing Context. AI Magazine, 17 (1998) 55-72.

Jonathan David Bobaljik, A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and 'Covert' Movement.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20 (2002) 197-267.

Botha, Rudolf P. Challenging Chomsky: The Generative Garden game. Blackwell (1989 Oxford, ISBN 0-631-16621-1.

Bozsahin, C. Deriving the Predicate-Argument Structure for a Free Word Order Language. cmp-lg/9808008 20Aug. 1998

Brants, Thorsten, Cascaded Markov Models. In: Comutational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-99) . A Workshop at the 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-99), Bergen, Norway, June 1999.cs.Cl/9906009

Brody, Michael, Projection and Phrase Structure.Ling. Inq., 29 (1998) 367-398.

Chomsky, N., Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Praeger (1986), New York.

Clarke, H. H.and Clarke, E. V., The Psychology of Language, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, (1977) New York.

Cook, V. J., Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. Basil Blackwell, (1988) Oxford.

Culicover, Peter W., The Minimalist Impulse.Syntax \& Semantics, 29 (1998) 47-77.

Downing, P.and Noonan, M. (eds), Word Order in Discourse, Typological Studies in Language (TSL), John Benjamin Publishing Company, (1995) Amsterdam.

Dummet, M., FREGE Philosophy of Language, Duckworth London, (1973) Second Edition (1981) p. 83.

Ferro, Lisa;Vilain, Marc and Yeh, Alexander, Learning Transformation Rules to Find Grammatical Relations. In: Comutational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-99) pp 43-55. A Workshop at the 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-99), Bergen, Norway, June 1999. cs. Cl/9906015

Frazier, Lyn, Sentence Processing.A Tutorial Review. Attention and Performance XII, The Psychology of Reading. edited Max Coltheart (1987) 559-586.

Garman, Michael, Psycholinguistics, (1990) Cambridge University Press.

Garret, M. F., Levels of Processing in Sentence Production, Ch. 8 in B. Butterworth (ed. ), Language Production, Vol. 1, Academic Press (1980), London.

Gerdemann Dale and van Noord Gertjan, Transducers from Rewrite Rules with Backreferences. cs. CL/9904008

Gibson, Edward, Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies. Cognition, 68 (1998) 1-76.

Graesser, Author C. ;Millis Keith K.and Zwaan Rolf A., Discourse Comprehension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48 (1997) 163-89.

Gleitman, Lila and Bloom, Paul, Language Acquisition. (1998), http: //mitpress. mit. edu/MITECS

Haegeman, Liliane, Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Second Edition, Basil Blackwell, (1994) Oxford.

Hall, Christopher J., Formal Linguistic and Mental Representations: Psycholinguistic Contributions to the Identification and Explanation of Morphological and Syntactic Competence, Lang, \& Cog. Processes, 10 (1995) 169-187.

Hornstein, N., Logical Form: from GB to minimalism. Blackwell, (1995) Massachusetts.

Hymans, N., The Theory of Parameters and Syntactic Development. (1985) p. 1 in Parameter Setting, eds.T. Roeper and E. Williams. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.

Jacobson, E., Electrophysiology of Mental Activities. Am. J. Psy., 44 (1932) 677-94, especially page 692.

Johnson, M.and Klein, E., Discourse, Anaphora and Parsing, CSLI Report (1986) 86-63.

Johnson, M.and Klein, E., A Declarative Formulation of Discourse Representation Theory. J. Sym. Logic, 51 (1986) 846.

Josephson Brain D.and Blair David G., A Holistic Approach to Language.

Lasnik, H., Minimalism. (1998),

Lee, Mark and Wilks, Yorick, An Ascription-based Approach to Speech Acts. In: Proceedings of Coling -96, Copenhagen. cs.CL/9904009

MacDonald, Maryellen C. ;Pearlmutter, Neal J.and Seidelberg, Mark S. Lexical Nature of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.Psy. Rev., 101 (1994) 676-703.

MacWinney, Brian, Models of the Emergence of Language. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 49 (1998) 199-227.

May, R. C., Logical Form: its structure and derivation. MIT Press (1985), Massachusetts. and also the reference: Logical Form in Linguistics. http: //mitpress. mit. edu/MITECS

McCloskey, James, in Linguistics (1988) : the Cambridge Survey. Cambridge University Press.

McGurk, H.and McDonald, J., Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices. Nature, 264 (1976) 746-8.

McDonald, Janet L., Language Acquisition: The Acquisition of Linguistic Structurein Normal and Special Populations. Ann. Rev. Psychol., 48 (1997) 215-241.

McKoon, Gail and Ratcliff, Robert, Memory-based Language Processing: Psycholinguinguistic Research in the 1990's. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 49 (1998) 25-42.

McNeil, DSo You Think That Gestures are Non Verbal?Psy. Rev. 92 (1985) 350-371.

McRae, Ken and Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J., Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension. J. Mem. \&Lang. 38 (1998) 283-312.

Montemurro, Marcelo A. Beyond the Zipf-Mandelbrot law in quantitive linguistics. cond-mat/0104066

Phillips, Collin, Syntax. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. McMillan Reference.

Prior, A. N. Formal Logic. Second Edition (1962), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Richards, Norvin, Dependency Formation and Directionality of Tree Construction. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 33 (1999) .

Rischel, Jorgen, Formal Linguistics and Real Speech. Speech Communication, 11 (1992) 379-392.

Roberts, Mark D., Does Meaning Evolve? Behaviour and Philosophy., 32 (2004) 401-426, cs. CL/9811004

Roberts, Mark D., Ultrametric Distance in Syntax. cs. CL/9810012

Rosenberg, S., Sentence Production: Developments in Research and Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (1977) New Jersey.

Seidelberg, M. S.and McClelland, J. L., A Distributed Development of Word Recognition and Naming. Psy. Rev., 96 (1989) 523-568.

Stanley, J. Logical Form, Origins of. (1998) http: //mitpress. mit. edu/MITECS

Stemberger, J., An Interactive Activation Model of Language Production. Ch. {\bf 5} in A. W. Ellis (ed. ) Vol. {\bf 1} (1985) Psychology of Language. London, Erlbaum.

Tabor, Witney;Juiano, Cornell and Tanenhaus, Michael K., Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing. Lang. and Cog. Processes, 12 (1997) 211-271.

Tanenhaus, Michael;Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J. ; Eberhard, Kathleen and Sedivy, Julie C., Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension. Science, 268 (1995) 1632-1634.

Trueswell, John, C.;Tanenhaus Michael K.andGarnsey, Susan M., Semantic Influences on Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. J. Mem. & Lang., 33 (1994) 285-318.

Valian, Virginia, Null Subjects: A problem for Parameter-setting Modelsof Linguistic Acquisition. Cognition, 35 (1990) 105-122.

Zohar, Yair Even and Roth, Dan, A Classification Approach to Word Prediction. cs. CL/0009027


Repository Staff Only: item control page