To Show and To Say: Comparing the Uses of Pictures and Language

Schirra, Dr Jörg R.J. and Sachs-Hombach, Dr Klaus (2007) To Show and To Say: Comparing the Uses of Pictures and Language. [Newspaper/Magazine Article]

Full text available as:

[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.



There has been a long tradition of characterizing man as the animal that talks. However, the remarkable ability of using pictures also only belongs to human beings, after all we know empirically so far. Are there conceptual reasons for that coincidence? Such a question belongs to the philosophy of language just as well as to philosophical visualistics. Comparing the two abilities to use words or pictures yields several similarities as well as distinctions. A well-known conceptual disparity between pictures and words appears in their relation to perception: the difference can be further determined in an act-theoretic manner by four modes of use of the sign vehicles during the corresponding sign acts. Furthermore, the figure/ground dichotomy means something different for language uses and picture uses. In both cases, however, there is a close relation to the function of context building, by which humans are able to communicate not only with respect to the present situation of behavior but with respect to arbitrary contexts as well. Although the structural comparison does clarify the conceptual relations, it cannot explain that the conceptual structure ought to be like that. Therefore, the paper concludes with the programme of a "concept-genetic" consideration of the two abilities (i.e., to use propositional language or to use pictures) that is able to give us such a foundation.

Item Type:Newspaper/Magazine Article
Additional Information:ISSN 1424-4896
Keywords:pictures. language, resemblance, logic, figure/ground, experiential contexts
Subjects:Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
ID Code:6243
Deposited By: Schirra, PD. Dr. Jörg R.J.
Deposited On:02 Nov 2008 10:05
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Bischof, Norbert (1998): Das Kraftfeld der Mythen, Piper: München.

Bogen, Steffen (2005): Kunstgeschichte/Kunstwissenschaft, in: Klaus Sachs-Hombach (Hg.): Bildwissenschaft. Disziplinen, Themen, Methoden, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 52–67.

Bredekamp, Horst (2003): Bildwissenschaft, in: Metzler Lexikon Kunstwissenschaft, J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

Dummett, Michael (1992): Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

Fauconnier, Gilles (1985): Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Fellmann, Ferdinand (2000): Bedeutung als Formproblem – Aspekte einer realistischen Bildsemantik. In: Sachs-Hombach, K. & Rehkämper, K. (Hg.): Vom Realismus der Bilder: Interdisziplinäre Forschungen zur Semantik bildhafter Darstellungsformen, Magdeburg: Scriptum, 17–40.

Frege, Gottlob (1892): Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100, 25–50.

Heider, F. (1927): Ding und Medium, Symposium 1, S. 109.

Johnson, Mark (1987): The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark (1980): Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Lakoff,George (1987): Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things – What Categories Reveal About the Mind, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press,.

Mead, George Herbert (1934): Mind, Self, and Society, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Plinius Secundus d. Ä. (1977): Naturkunde (Naturalis Historiae), Lat.-dt., Buch XXXV: Farben, Malerei, Plastik, hg. und übersetzt von Roderich König in Zusammenarbeit mit Gerhard Winkler, 2., überarbeitete Auflage, Düsseldorf / Zürich: Artemis und Winkler.

Ros, Arno (1999/2000): Begründung und Begriff – Wandlungen des Verständnisses begrifflicher Argumentationen, 3 Vol. (Vol. 1 1989, Vol. 2 & 3 1990), Hamburg: Meiner.

Ros, Arno (2005): Materie und Geist. Eine philosophische Untersuchung, Paderborn: Mentis.

Sachs-Hombach, Klaus (2003): Das Bild als kommunikatives Medium. Elemente einer allgemeinen Bildwissenschaft, Köln: Herbert von Halem.

Sachs-Hombach, Klaus & Schirra, Jörg R.J. (2002): Selecting Styles For Tele-Rendering. Toward a rhetoric in computational visualistics, in: Proc. 2nd International Symposium on Smart Graphics 2002, Hawthorne, NY: ACM Press, 102–106.

Schirra, Jörg R.J. (2005): Foundation of Computational Visualistics, Wiesbaden: DUV.

Schirra, Jörg R.J. & Sachs-Hombach, Klaus (2006): Fähigkeiten zum Bild- und Sprachgebrauch. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 54:887–905.

Scholz, Oliver R. (2000): Bild, in: Barck, Karlheinz u. a. (Hg.): Ästhetische Grundbegriffe. Historisches Wörterbuch in sieben Bänden, Bd. 1, Stuttgart: Metzler, 618-669.

Tugendhat, Ernst (1976): Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die sprachanalytische Philosophie, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp (in English: Traditional and Analytic Philosophy: Lectures on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: University Press, 1982).

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922): Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.


Repository Staff Only: item control page