Identification of Factors Influencing Third Birth Transition in Manipur

Singh, NS and Singh, WS and Singh, NS (2011) Identification of Factors Influencing Third Birth Transition in Manipur. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.



The third birth transition has a negative impact on the national goal of fertility replacement level (2.1) which is to be achieved by 2010. To identify the factors influencing the demographic phenomenon, a cross sectional as well as community based study consisting of 1397 eligible women was conducted in the four valley districts of Manipur under cluster sampling scheme. Analysing the empirical information through SPSS, 42% of the study subjects transit their 3rd birth and its major determinants could be detected to be sex preference, age at marriage, and educational level each at 0.01 probability level of significance.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:Age at marriage; Sex of previous child; Education of wife; Third child
Subjects:JOURNALS > Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences
ID Code:7793
Deposited By: Kakkilaya Bevinje, Dr. Srinivas
Deposited On:16 Dec 2011 00:01
Last Modified:16 Dec 2011 00:01

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Bardhan PK. Sex disparity in child survival in Rural India. In Srinivasan TN, Bardhan PK, editors. Rural poverty in South India. Oxford University Press; 1988. P. 472-482.

2. Mason KO. Family change and support of elderly in Asia: what does we know?. Asia Pacific Population Journal 1992;7(3): (East West Centre Reprint Series No. 286).

3. Dharmalingam A. The social context of family size preferences and fertility behabiour in a South Indian Village. Genus 1996;52:83-103.

4. Nath DC, Deka AK. The importance of son in a traditional society: How elderly parents see it? Demography India 2004;33(1):33-46.

5. Moore M. Indian Plan thwarted by quest for sons. Population grows as farmers insist upon two male heirs. Washington Post 1994; Sept. A 26.

6. Nath DC, Leonetti DL. Correlates of coital patterns in a traditional Indian society. In Yadava RC, editors. Dynamics of population change (Emerging issues of 21st Century). Delhi: Shipra Publication; 2001. P. 57-67.

7. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey-3, 2005-06: Key findings, 2007: 5.

8. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). National Family Health Survey-3, 2005-06: Manipur, 2008: 46.

9. Henry L. Some data on natural fertility. Eugenics Quarterly 1961;8:81-91.

10. Henry L. On the measurement of human fertility. A population council book 1972, London.

11. Yadava NS, Jain SK, Kumar A. Fertility differentials in Eastern Utter Pradesh: a multivariate analysis. Janasamkhya 2000;18:18-29.

12. Vignoli D. Fertility change in Egypt: From second to third birth. Max-Plak Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper 2006.

13. Singh NS, Narendra RK, Hemochandra L. Determinants of waiting time to conception in Manipuri women. Kuwait Medical Journal 2007;39(1):39-43.

14. Hussain R, Fikree FF, Berendes HW. The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 2000;78(3):379-388.

15. Youssef R M. Duration and determinants of interbirth interval: community-based survey of women in southern Jordan. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2005;11(4):559-572.

16. Khawaja M, Randall A. Intifada, Palestinian fertility and women’s education. Genus 2006;LXII(1):21-51


Repository Staff Only: item control page