Cogprints

Are abstract concepts like dinosaur feathers? Objectification as a conceptual tool: evidence from language and gesture of English and Polish native speakers

Jelec, Anna (2013) Are abstract concepts like dinosaur feathers? Objectification as a conceptual tool: evidence from language and gesture of English and Polish native speakers. [Thesis]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
 PDF - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
1463Kb

Abstract

Studies based on the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999) usually identify conceptual metaphors by analysing linguistic expressions and creating a post hoc interpretation of the findings. This method has been questioned for a variety of reasons, including its circularity (Müller, 2008), lack of falsifiability (Vervaeke & Kennedy, 1996, 2004), and lack of predictive power (Ritchie, 2003). It has been argued that CTM requires additional constraints to improve its applicability for empirical research (Gibbs, 2011; Ritchie, 2003). This paper sets out to propose additional methodological structure to CTM, a theory of conceptual metaphor in which much of abstract thought is generated by metaphorical mapping from embodied experience (Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Pérez Hernández, 2011). Introducing Objectification Theory defined by Szwedek (2002, 2007, 2011) ameliorates a number of methodological issues in CTM. First, the embodiment claim of CTM in its current form cannot be empirically proven incorrect (Vervaeke & Kennedy, 2004) as any mapping within it is possible (although only some actually happen). Objectification introduces pre-metaphorical structure of the kind suggested by Glucksberg (2001), constraining source and target domain selection, predicting which mappings are more likely to happen. Second, while many claim that metaphors trace back to a literal concept based on embodied physical experience (Gibbs, Costa Lima, & Francozo, 2004), it is unclear what criteria are used to define „physical”. Metaphorical domains are often described using the terms „abstract” and „concrete”, Objectification proposes objective criteria for deciding whether a concept is experientially grounded. Finally, Objectification provides grounds for introducing a hierarchical framework for metaphor typology, preventing post-hoc addition of metaphor types if and when suitable for the explanation of a phenomenon; thus increasing the consistency of the CTM framework, both internally and with other cognitive science disciplines. This thesis focuses on providing evidence for Objectification Theory and identifying its applications in metaphor and gesture research.

Item Type:Thesis
Keywords:Objectification theory, conceptual metaphor, abstract concepts, concrete concepts, concreteness, metaphorical gesture, blindness
Subjects:Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Computer Science > Language
Linguistics > Semantics
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
ID Code:8981
Deposited By: Jelec, Anna
Deposited On:17 Sep 2013 14:26
Last Modified:17 Sep 2013 14:26

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

References

Acredolo, L.P., S.W. Goodwyn, K.D. Horobin and Y.D. Emmons. 1999. ‘The signs and sounds of early language development’ , in: Lawrence Balter and Catherine Ta- mis-LeMonda (eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 116–139.

Aitchison, Jean. 2012. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Alibali, Martha Wagner, Miriam Bassok, Karen Olseth Solomon, Sharon E. Syc and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 1999. ‘Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture’ , Psychological Science 10, 4: 327–333. (date of access: 4 Jan. 2013).

Alibali, Martha Wagner and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 1993. ‘Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind’ , Cognitive psychology 25: 468–468.

Alibali, Martha Wagner, Dana C. Heath and Heather J. Myers. 2001. ‘Effects of visibil- ity between speaker and listener on gesture production: some gestures are meant to be seen’ , Journal of Memory and Language 44, 2: 169–188. (date of access: 13 Jan. 2013).

Andersen, Susan M. and Roberta L. Klatzky. 1987. ‘Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception.’ , Journal of Personality and So- cial Psychology 53, 2: 235.

Arbib, Michael A. (ed.). 2006. Action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cam- bridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Arbib, Michael A. 2006. ‘The mirror system hypothesis on the linkage of action and languages’ , in: Michael A. Arbib (ed.), Action to language via the mirror neuron system. Cambridge: USA, London: UK: Cambridge University Press, 3– 47.

171

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. ‘Perceptual symbol systems’ , Behavioral and brain sci- ences 22, 04: 577–660.

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. ‘Grounded Cognition’ , Annual Review of Psychology 59, 1: 617–645. (date of access: 1 Jan. 2013).

Barsalou, Lawrence W., Ava Santos, W. Kyle Simmons and Christine D. Wilson. 2008. ‘Language and simulation in conceptual processing’ , Symbols, embodiment, and meaning: 245–283.

Bates, Timothy C and Lawrence D’Oliveiro. 2003. ‘PsyScript: A Macintosh application for scripting experiments’ , Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Com- puters 35, 4: 565–576.

De Beaugrande, R. and W.U. Dressler. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. London and New York: Longman.

Becker, Angela H. 1997. ‘Emergent and common features influence metaphor interpret- ation’ , Metaphor and symbol 12, 4: 243–259.

Beer, Randall D. 2000. ‘Dynamical approaches to cognitive science’ , Trends in Cognit- ive Sciences 4, 3: 91–99. (date of access: 10 Mar. 2013).

Binder, Jeffrey R., Rutvik H. Desai, William W. Graves and Lisa L. Conant. 2009. ‘Where Is the Semantic System? A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of 120 Functional Neuroimaging Studies’ , Cerebral Cortex 19, 12: 2767–2796. (date of access: 13 Mar. 2013).

Binder, Jeffrey R., C. F. Westbury, K. A. McKiernan, E. T. Possing and D. A. Medler. 2005. ‘Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts’ , Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 6: 905–917. (date of access: 15 Mar. 2013).

Blasko, Dawn G. and Cynthia M. Connine. 1993. ‘Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing’ , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19, 2: 295–308.

Blass, Thomas, Norbert Friedman and Irving Steingart. 1974. ‘Body movement and verbal encoding in the congenitally blind’ , Perceptual and motor skills 39, 1: 279–293. (date of access: 9 Jan. 2013).

Bloom, Paul, Merrill F. Garrett, Lynn Nadel and Mary A. Peterson (eds.). 1999. Lan- guage and Space. (Reprint.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bogdashina, Olga. 2003. Sensory perceptual issues in autism and asperger syndrome: Different sensory experiences-different perceptual worlds. London and New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

172

Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. ‘Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors’ , Cognition 75, 1: 1–28.

Brambring, Michael and Heinrich Tröster. 1992. ‘On the stability of stereotyped behavi- ors in blind infants and preschoolers’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blind- ness 86, 2: 105–110.

Bright, P., H. Moss and L.K. Tyler. 2004. ‘Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing’ , Brain and Language 89, 3: 417–432. (date of ac- cess: 14 Mar. 2013).

Bruce, Susan M., Alison Mann, Chelsea Jones and Mary Gavin. 2007. ‘Gestures ex- pressed by children who are congenitally deaf-blind: Topography, rate, and func- tion’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 101, 10: 637. (date of access: 9 Jan. 2013).

Brugman, Claudia. 1990. ‘What is the Invariance Hypothesis?’ , Cognitive Linguistics 1, 2: 257–268. (date of access: 28 Dec. 2012).

Camac, Mary K. and Sam Glucksberg. 1984. ‘Metaphors do not use associations between concepts, they are used to create them’ , Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13, 6: 443–455. (date of access: 12 Dec. 2012).

Cameron, Lynne and Alice Deignan. 2003. ‘Combining large and small corpora to in- vestigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse’ , Metaphor and Symbol 18, 3: 149–160.

Casasanto, Daniel. 2008. ‘Conceptual affiliates of metaphorical gestures’ , in: Interna- tional Conference on Language, Communication, & Cognition. Brighton, UK. (http://www.casasanto.com/Site/papers/Casasanto_ConceptualAffiliatesGes - tures.pdf) (date of access: 9 Dec. 2012).

Casasanto, Daniel. 2010. ‘Space for thinking’ , Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions: 453–478. (date of access: 9 Dec. 2012).

Casasanto, Daniel, John Kounios, Anne Roc, David Mintzer, Joseph Maldjian and John Detre. 2001. ‘Hemispheric effects of concreteness during verbal episodic memory encoding’ , NeuroImage 13, 6: 644. (date of access: 16 Mar. 2013).

Casasanto, Daniel and Sandra Lozano. 2007. ‘The meaning of metaphorical gestures’ , in: Alan J. Cienki and Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and Gesture. Gesture studies, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. (http://lingo.stanford.edu/sag/papers/Casas-Lozano-forthc.pdf) (date of access: 9 Dec. 2012).

Cassell, Justine and David McNeill. 1991. ‘Gesture and the poetics of prose’ , Poetics Today 12, 3: 375–404. (date of access: 8 Apr. 2013).

173

Chandler, Steven R. 1991. ‘Metaphor comprehension: A connectionist approach to im- plications for the mental lexicon’ , Metaphor and Symbol 6, 4: 227–258. (date of access: 30 Nov. 2012).

Chee, Michael W.L., Brendan Weekes, Kok Ming Lee, Chun Siong Soon, Axel Schreiber, Jia Jia Hoon and Marilyn Chee. 2000. ‘Overlap and dissociation of semantic processing of Chinese characters, English words, and pictures: Evid- ence from fMRI’ , NeuroImage 12, 4: 392–403. (date of access: 14 Mar. 2013).

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. ‘On binding’ , Linguistic inquiry 11, 1: 1–46.

Chui, Kawai. 2011. ‘Conceptual metaphors in gesture’ , Cognitive Linguistics 22, 3. (http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cogl.2011.22.issue- 3/cogl.2011.017/cogl.2011.017.xml) (date of access: 10 Jan. 2013).

Cienki, Alan J. 2008. ‘Why study metaphor and gesture’ , in: Alan J. Cienki and Corne- lia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture. Gesture studies, Amsterdam, the Neth- erlands: John Benjamins Publishing, 5–25.

Cienki, Alan J. and Cornelia Müller (eds.). 2008. Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.

Cohen, Akiba A. 1977. ‘The communicative functions of hand illustrators’ , Journal of Communication 27, 4: 54–63. (date of access: 13 Jan. 2013).

Cohen, Akiba A. and Randall P. Harrison. 1973. ‘Intentionality in the use of hand illus- trators in face-to-face communication situations’ , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28, 2: 276–279.

Collins, Allan M. and Elizabeth F. Loftus. 1975. ‘A spreading-activation theory of se- mantic processing.’ , Psychological review 82, 6: 407.

Coltheart, Max. 1981. ‘The MRC psycholinguistic database’ , The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 33, 4: 497–505. (date of access: 17 Mar. 2013).

Coulson, Seana and Todd Oakley. 2000. ‘Blending basics’ , Cognitive linguistics 11, 3- 4: 175–196. (date of access: 22 Jan. 2013).

Coulson, Seana and Cyma Van Petten. 2002. ‘Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study’ , Memory and Cognition 30, 6: 958–968. (date of access: 11 Dec. 2012).

Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse (eds.). 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, Eng- land: Cambridge University Press.

Cruse, Damian, Srivas Chennu, Camille Chatelle, Tristan A Bekinschtein, Davinia Fernández-Espejo, John D Pickard, Steven Laureys and Adrian M Owen. 2011.

174

‘Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study’ , The Lancet 378, 9809: 2088–2094. (date of access: 10 Mar. 2013).

Cutsforth, Thomas D. 1951. The blind in school and society: A psychological study. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.

Davidoff, J. and R. Debleser. 1994. ‘Impaired picture recognition with preserved object naming and reading’ , Brain and Cognition 24, 1: 1–23. (date of access: 14 Mar. 2013).

Dąbrowski, A. 1964. Orientacja i poruszanie się niewidomych w przestrzeni. Warszawa: Polski Związek Niewidomych.

Della Rosa, Pasquale A., Eleonora Catricalà, Gabriella Vigliocco and Stefano F. Cappa. 2010. ‘Beyond the abstract—concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, con- creteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words’ , Behavior Research Methods 42, 4: 1042–1048. (date of access: 18 Mar. 2013).

Doidge, Norman. 2007. The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. (2nd edition.) London: Penguin Books.

Duch, Włodzisław. 2009. ‘Reprezentacje umysłowe jako aproksymacje stanów mózgu’ , Studia z Kognitywistyki i Filozofii Umysłu 3: 5–28.

Dunlea, Anne. 1989. Vision and the emergence of meaning: Blind and sighted children’s early language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Edelman, Shimon. 2003. ‘But will it scale up? Not without representations’ , Adaptive Behavior 11, 4: 273–275. (date of access: 25 Jan. 2013).

Eichel, Valerie J. 1979. ‘A Taxonomy for Mannerisms of Blind Children.’ , Journal of visual impairment and blindness 73, 5: 167–78.

Ekman, Paul and Wallace V. Friesen. 1972. ‘Hand Movements’ , Journal of Communic- ation 22, 4: 353–374. (date of access: 6 Feb. 2013).

Ekman, Paul and Wallace V. Friesen. 1974. ‘Detecting deception from the body or face’ , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29, 3: 288–298.

Eliasmith, Chris. 2003. ‘Moving beyond metaphors: Understanding the mind for what it is’ , The Journal of philosophy 100, 10: 493–520. (date of access: 30 Nov. 2012).

Elman, Jeffrey L. 1990. ‘Finding structure in time’ , Cognitive Science 14, 2: 179–211. (date of access: 13 Mar. 2013).

Elman, Jeffrey L., Elizabeth A. Bates, Mark Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Domen- ico Parisi and Kim Plunkett (eds.). 1998. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

175

Ericsson, K. Anders and Herbert A. Simon. 1993. ‘Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data’ , in: Teun Van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Evans, Vyvyan. 2010. ‘Figurative language understanding in LCCM Theory’ , Cognitive Linguistics 21, 4: 601–662. (date of access: 27 Nov. 2012).

Fabiani, Monica, Gabriele Gratton and Michael G.H. Coles. 2000. ‘Event-related brain potentials’ , in: Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 53–84.

Fabiszak, Małgorzata. 2007. A Conceptual Metaphor approach to war discourse and its implications. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Feng, Shi, Zhiqiang Cai, Scott Crossley and Danielle S. McNamara. 2011. ‘Simulating human ratings on word concreteness’ , in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth In- ternational Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. (http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS11/paper/viewPDFIntersti- tial/2644/3035) (date of access: 17 Mar. 2013).

Fliessbach, K., S. Weis, P. Klaver, C.E. Elger and B. Weber. 2006. ‘The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory’ , NeuroImage 32, 3: 1413–1421. (date of access: 15 Mar. 2013).

Fodor, Jerry A. 1975. The language of thought. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Fodor, Jerry A. and Zenon W. Pylyshyn. 1988. ‘Connectionism and cognitive architec- ture: A critical analysis’ , Cognition 28, 1–2: 3–71. (date of access: 10 Mar. 2013).

Fogassi, Leonardo and Pier Francesco Ferrari. 2007. ‘Mirror neurons and the evolution of embodied language’ , Current Directions in Psychological Science 16, 3: 136–141. (date of access: 7 May. 2013).

Fricke, Ellen. 2004. ‘Origo, Geste und Raum: Lokaldeixis im Deutschen.’

Gabora, Liane, Eleanor H. Rosch and Diederik Aerts. 2008. ‘Toward an ecological the-

ory of concepts’ , Ecological Psychology 20, 1: 84–116.

Gallese, Vittorio and George Lakoff. 2005. ‘The brain’s concepts: the role of the sens- ory-motor system in conceptual knowledge’ , Cognitive Neuropsychology 22, 3- 4: 455–479.

Ganis, Giorgio and Stephen M. Kosslyn. 2002. ‘Neuroimaging’ , in: Vilayanur S. Ramachandran (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Human Brain. , 493–505.

176

(http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~kwn/Kosslyn_pdfs/2002Ganis_chap_in_EncyHu- manBrain3_Neuroimaging.pdf) (date of access: 16 Mar. 2013).

Gates, Larry and Myong G. Yoon. 2005. ‘Distinct and shared cortical regions of the hu- man brain activated by pictorial depictions versus verbal descriptions: an fMRI study’ , NeuroImage 24, 2: 473–486. (date of access: 14 Mar. 2013).

Gentner, Dedre, M. Imai and Lera Boroditsky. 2002. ‘As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space→ time metaphors’ , Language and cognitive processes 17, 5: 537–565. (date of access: 12 Jan. 2013).

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language, and un- derstanding. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, Raymond W. 1996. ‘Why many concepts are metaphorical’ , Cognition 61: 309– 319. (date of access: 30 Nov. 2012).

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2000. ‘Making good psychology out of blending theory’ , Cognit- ive Linguistics 11, 3-4: 347–358. (date of access: 22 Jan. 2013).

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2007. ‘Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods’ , in: Mónica González-Márquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson and Michael J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam, the Neth- erlands: John Benjamins Publishing, 2–18.

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2008. ‘Metaphor and gesture: Some implications for psychology’ , in: Alan J. Cienki and Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture. Amster- dam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing, 291–301.

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2011. ‘Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory’ , Discourse Pro- cesses 48, 8: 529–562. (date of access: 1 Oct. 2012).

Gibbs, Raymond W. and Eric A. Berg. 2002. ‘Mental imagery and embodied activity’ , Journal of Mental Imagery 26, 1-2: 1–30.

Gibbs, Raymond W., Josephine M. Bogdanovich, Jeffrey R. Sykes and Dale J. Barr. 1997. ‘Metaphor in idiom comprehension’ , Journal of memory and language 37, 2: 141–154. (date of access: 10 Jan. 2013).

Gibbs, Raymond W., Paula Lenz Costa Lima and Edson Francozo. 2004. ‘Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience’ , Journal of Pragmatics 36, 7: 1189–1210. (date of access: 14 Dec. 2012).

Glucksberg, Sam. 2001. Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphor to Idioms. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Glucksberg, Sam. 2003. ‘The psycholinguistics of metaphor’ , Trends in cognitive sci- ences 7, 2: 92–96. (date of access: 10 Dec. 2012).

177

Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2003. ‘Beyond words: The importance of gesture to researchers and learners’ , Child Development 71, 1: 231–239. (date of access: 9 Jan. 2013).

Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2005. ‘The two faces of gesture: Language and thought’ , Ges- ture 5, 1-2: 1–2. (date of access: 22 Jan. 2013).

Goldstone, Robert L and Lawrence W. Barsalou. 1998. ‘Reuniting perception and con- ception’ , Cognition 65, 2: 231–262. (date of access: 10 Jan. 2013).

Goldstone, Robert L and Alan Kersten. 2003. ‘Concepts and categorization’ , in: Hand- book of Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 597–621.

Gould, Stephen Jay. 1991. ‘Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology’ , Journal of social issues 47, 3: 43–65.

Gould, Stephen Jay and Elizabeth S. Vrba. 1982. ‘Exaptation-a missing term in the sci- ence of form’ , Paleobiology: 4–15.

Grady, Joseph E. 1997. ‘THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited’ , Cognitive Linguist- ics 8, 4: 267–290. (date of access: 14 Dec. 2012).

Grady, Joseph E. 1999. ‘A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance’ , Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science: 79–100.

Grady, Joseph E., Sarah F. Taub and P. Morgan. 1996. ‘Primitive and compound meta- phors’ , Conceptual structure, discourse and language: 177–187.

Hamilton, David L. (ed.). 1981. Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Be- havior. (1st edition.) Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hampe, Beate. 2005. ‘Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction’ , in: Beate Hampe and Joseph E. Grady (eds.), From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–12.

Harnad, Stevan. 1990. ‘The symbol grounding problem’ , Physica D: Nonlinear Phe- nomena 42, 1–3: 335–346. (date of access: 11 Mar. 2013).

Hauk, Olaf and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2011. ‘The Lateralization of Motor Cortex Activation to Action-Words’ , Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3225902/) (date of access: 11 Mar. 2013).

Heller, Morton A. and John M. Kennedy. 1990. ‘Perspective taking, pictures, and the blind’ , Perception and Psychophysics 48, 5: 459–466. (date of access: 3 May. 2013).

178

Hermelin, B. and N. O’Connor. 1971. ‘Spatial coding in normal, autistic and blind chil- dren.’ , Perceptual and Motor Skills 33, 1: 127–132. (date of access: 12 Jan. 2013).

Van Herwegen, Jo, Dagmara Dimitriou and Gabriella Rundblad. 2013. ‘Development of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in typically developing children and Williams syndrome’ , Research in Developmental Disabilities 34, 4: 1300– 1311. (date of access: 2 May. 2013).

Hills, David. 2011. ‘Metaphor’ , The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (http://pla- to.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/metaphor/) (date of access: 13 Oct. 2012).

Hilpert, Martin. 2007. ‘Chained metonymies in lexicon and grammar’ , in: Günter Rad- den, Klaus-Michael Köpke, Thomas Berg and Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publish- ing, 77–98.

Hostetter, Autumn B. 2011. ‘When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis.’ , Psy- chological Bulletin 137, 2: 297–315. (date of access: 12 Nov. 2012).

Hostetter, Autumn B. and Martha Wagner Alibali. 2008. ‘Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action’ , Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15, 3: 495–514. (date of access: 25 Jan. 2013).

Hurtienne, Jörn, Christian Stößel, Christine Sturm, Alexander Maus, Matthias Rötting, Patrick Langdon and John Clarkson. 2010. ‘Physical gestures for abstract con- cepts: Inclusive design with primary metaphors’ , Interacting with Computers 22, 6: 475–484. (date of access: 9 May. 2013).

Iverson, Jana M. and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 1997. ‘What’s communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth.’ , Developmental Psychology 33, 3: 453. (date of access: 9 Jan. 2013).

Iverson, Jana M. and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 1998. ‘Why people gesture when they speak’ , Nature 396, 6708: 228–228.

Iverson, Jana M. and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2001. ‘The resilience of gesture in talk: gesture in blind speakers and listeners’ , Developmental Science 4, 4: 416–422.

Iverson, Jana M., Heather L. Tencer, Jill Lany and Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2000. ‘The relation between gesture and speech in congenitally blind and sighted lan- guage-learners’ , Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 2: 105–130. (date of access: 5 May. 2013).

Jaworska-Biskup, Katarzyna. 2009. ‘Wpływ rozumienia pojec przez dzieci niewidome na nauczanie jezyków obcych’ , Szkoła specjalna. Dwumiesięcznik Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej LXX, 1(248): 25–34.

179

Jaworska-Biskup, Katarzyna. 2010a. ‘Dlaczego warto uczyc dzieci niewidome jezyków obcych? Jezyk obcy jako kompensacyjne narzedzie w procesie poznawania świ- ata i zdobywania wiedzy na temat pojec’ , in: T. Żółkowska, B. Ostapiuk and M. Wlazło (eds.), Wyzwania współczesnej pedagogiki specjalnej - praktyka edukacyjna i rewalidacyjna. Szczecin: Print group, 1–6. (http://monografie.pl/glownavspol/monografie_2009tVI/artykuly/157_pdfsam_k oncowa%20wersja%20polska%20tom%20VI.pdf) (date of access: 1 May. 2013).

Jaworska-Biskup, Katarzyna. 2010b. ‘Foreign language learning as a compensatory tool in gaining knowledge about the concept meaning. A case study of a congenitally blind boy.’ , in: T. Żółkowska and L. Konopska (eds.), Disability-the contextual- ity of its meaning. Szczecin: Print group, 177–181. (http://www.monografie.pl/monografie_2009/artykuly/177_pdfsam_mono - grafie2009.pdf) (date of access: 3 May. 2013).

Jaworska-Biskup, Katarzyna. 2011. ‘The world without sight. A comparative study of concept understanding in Polish congenitally totally blind and sighted children’ , Psychology of Language and Communication 15, 1: 28–47. (date of access: 3 May. 2013).

Jelec, Anna. 2009. ‘Mind: Meet Network. Objectification as an emergent property of conceptual metaphorisation.’

Jelec, Anna, Zuzanna Fleischer and Dorota Jaworska. 2012. ‘Znaczenie badawcze gestu w analizie procesów poznawczych osób niewidomych i niedowidzących’ , in: Maria H. Golka, Adam Kupś and Katarzyna Paluszkiewicz (eds.), Poznańskie Forum Kognitywistyczne: teksty pokonferencyjne nr 6. Poznań.

Jelec, Anna and Dorota Jaworska. 2011. ‘Mind: meet network. Emergence of features in conceptual metaphor’ , in: Text processing and cognitive technologies. The XIII- th International Conference Cognitive Modeling in Linguistics. Proceedings. Korfu, Greece, 34–36.

Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. (1st edition.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, Mark. 1993. ‘Conceptual metaphor and embodied structures of meaning: A reply to Kennedy and Vervaeke’ , Philosophical Psychology 6, 4: 413–422. (date of access: 9 May. 2013).

Joordens, Steve and Suzanna Becker. 1997. ‘The long and short of semantic priming ef- fects in lexical decision.’ , Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23, 5: 1083.

Juurmaa, Jyrki. 1973. ‘Transposition in mental spatial manipulation: A theoretical ana- lysis’ , American Foundation for the Blind, Research Bulletin 26: 87–134.

180

Katz, Robert B. and Harold Goodglass. 1990. ‘Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder’ , Brain and Language 39, 1: 153–185. (date of access: 18 Mar. 2013).

Kendon, Adam. 1972. ‘Some relationships between body motion and speech’ , Studies in dyadic communication 7: 177.

Kendon, Adam. 1988. ‘How gestures can become like words’ , in: F. Poyatos (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe Publishers, 131–141.

Kendon, Adam. 1994. ‘Do Gestures Communicate? A Review’ , Research on Language and Social Interaction 27, 3: 175–200. (date of access: 4 Jan. 2013).

Kendon, Adam. 2000. ‘Language and gesture: Unity or duality’ , in: David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture: : Window into thought and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–63.

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.

Kendon, Adam. 2012. ‘P.c.’

Kertész, András and Csilla Rákosi. 2009. ‘Cyclic vs. circular argumentation in the Con- ceptual Metaphor Theory’ , Cognitive Linguistics 20, 4. (http://www.degruyter.- com/view/j/cogl.2009.20.issue-4/cogl.2009.030/cogl.2009.030.xml) (date of ac- cess: 1 Oct. 2012).

Keysar, Boaz, Yeshayahu Shen, Sam Glucksberg and William S. Horton. 2000. ‘Con- ventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?’ , Journal of Memory and Lan- guage 43, 4: 576–593. (date of access: 28 Nov. 2012).

Kita, Sotaro. 1990. ‘The temporal relationship between gesture and speech: A study of Japanese-English bilinguals’

Kounios, John and Phillip J. Holcomb. 1994. ‘Concreteness effects in semantic pro- cessing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory.’ , Journal of Experi- mental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 4: 804.

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2002. Metaphor: A practical introduction. (1st edition.) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2003. Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2011. ‘Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones?’ , Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9, 1: 11–25.

181

Krzeszowski, Tomasz. 1993. ‘Rola jezyków obcych w kształceniu niewidomych i słabo widzących’ , Przegląd Tyflologiczny , 1-2: 24–31.

Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1984. ‘Tertium comparationis’ , in: Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Con- trastive linguistics. Prospects and problems. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 301–312.

Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 2002. ‘Problems that are not supposed to arise?’ , Cognitive Linguistics 13, 3: 265–270. (date of access: 28 Nov. 2012).

Labov, William. 1973. ‘The boundaries of words and their meanings’ , in: Roger W. Shuy and Charles-James N. Bailey (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 340–373.

Lakens, Daniel. 2010. Abstract concepts in grounded cognition. Utrecht: Utrecht Uni- versity. (http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2010-0114- 200203/UUindex.html) (date of access: 28 Nov. 2012).

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things – What categories reveal about the mind. (1st edition.) Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, George. 1990. ‘The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on im- age-schemas?’ , Cognitive Linguistics 1, 1: 39–74. (date of access: 2 Oct. 2012).

Lakoff, George. 1993. ‘The contemporary theory of metaphor’ , in: Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–251.

Lakoff, George. 2008. ‘The neural theory of metaphor’ , in: Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 17–38.

Lakoff, George, Jane Espenson and Alan Schwartz. 1991. Master Metaphor List. (Draft 2nd edition.) Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. (1st edition.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy In The Flesh. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. (2nd edition.) Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: Field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Landau, Barbara and Lila R. Gleitman. 1988. Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

182

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. ‘Metaphoric gesture and cognitive linguistics’ , in: Alan J. Cienki and Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, the Neth- erlands: John Benjamins Publishing, 249–251.

Machery, Edouard. 2007. ‘100 years of psychology of concepts: the theoretical notion of concept and its operationalization’ , Studies in History and Philosophy of Sci- ence Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38, 1: 63–84. (date of access: 22 Jan. 2013).

Machery, Edouard. 2011. ‘Concepts: A Tutorial’ , in: Radim Bělohlávek and George J. Klir (eds.), Concepts and Fuzzy Logic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 13–44.

Magnusson, Anna-Karin and Gunnar Karlsson. 2008. ‘The body language of adults who are blind’ , Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10, 2: 71–89. (date of access: 3 May. 2013).

Majewski, Tadeusz. 1983. Psychologia niewidomych i niedowidzących. Warszawa: PWN.

Mandler, Jean M. 1999. ‘Preverbal Representation and Language’ , in: Paul Bloom, Merrill F. Garrett, Lynn Nadel and Mary A. Peterson (eds.), Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 365.

Mandler, Jean M. and Laraine McDonough. 1993. ‘Concept formation in infancy’ , Cognitive Development 8, 3: 291–318. (date of access: 2 Jan. 2013).

Marek, Bogusław. 1997. ‘Before a blind child can read a map: first steps in tactile graphics’ , in: Lawrence Campbell, Marta Campos, Brandi Furry and Robert Mortimer (eds.), Proceedings of 10th World ICEVI conference. Sao Paulo: ICEVI.

Marek, Bogusław. 1999. ‘A blind child in an English language classroom’ , Network. A journal for English language teacher education 2, 1: 3–8.

Marek, Bogusław. 2000. ‘Does a stone look the way it feels’ , in: Kraków.

Mareschal, Denis, Mark Johnson, Sylvain Sirois, Michael Spratling, Michael S. C. Thomas and Gert Westermann. 2007. Neuroconstructivism - I: How the Brain Constructs Cognition. (1st edition.) New York: Oxford University Press.

Mareschal, Denis and Michael S. C. Thomas. 2006. ‘How computational models help explain the origins of reasoning’ , Computational Intelligence Magazine, IEEE 1, 3: 32–40. (date of access: 30 Nov. 2012).

Markman, Arthur B. 1999. Knowledge Representation. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

183

Markman, Arthur B. and Eric Dietrich. 2000a. ‘Extending the classical view of repres- entation’ , Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 12: 470–475. (date of access: 24 Jan. 2013).

Markman, Arthur B. and Eric Dietrich. 2000b. ‘In Defense of Representation’ , Cognit- ive Psychology 40, 2: 138–171. (date of access: 13 Mar. 2013).

Martin, Alex. 2007. ‘The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain’ , Annual Re- view of Psychology 58, 1: 25–45. (date of access: 16 Mar. 2013).

Matlock, Teenie, M. Ramscar and Lera Boroditsky. 2003. ‘The experiential basis of meaning’ , in: Richard Alterman and David Hirsh (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society, 792–797. (http://psych.stanford.edu/~michael/papers/2003_ramscar_experiential.pdf)

(date of access: 10 Jan. 2013).

McClave, Evelyn Z. 2000. ‘Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of

speech’ , Journal of Pragmatics 32, 7: 855–878. (date of access: 7 Apr. 2013).

McElree, Brian and Johanna Nordlie. 1999. ‘Literal and figurative interpretations are computed in equal time’ , Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6, 3: 486–494. (date of access: 11 Dec. 2012).

McGinnis, A.R. 1981. ‘Functional linguistic strategies of blind children.’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 75, 5: 210–14.

McGlone, Matthew S. 1996. ‘Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpreta- tion: Food for thought?’ , Journal of memory and language 35, 4: 544–565. (date of access: 11 Oct. 2012).

McGlone, Matthew S. 2001. ‘Concepts as metaphors’ , in: Sam Glucksberg (ed.), Un- derstanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press, 90–107.

McGlone, Matthew S. 2007. ‘What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor?’ , Language and Communication 27, 2: 109–126. (date of access: 1 Oct. 2012).

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Meltzoff, Andrew N. and Richard W. Borton. 1979. ‘Intermodal matching by human

neonates’ , Nature 282, 5737: 403–404. (date of access: 14 Dec. 2012).

184

Meyer, David E. and Roger W. Schvaneveldt. 1971. ‘Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations’ , Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology 90, 2: 227–234.

Miles, Lynden K., Louise K. Nind and C. Neil Macrae. 2010. ‘Moving through time’ , Psychological Science 21, 2. (http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/01/08/0956797609359333) (date of access: 12 Dec. 2012).

Millar, Susanna. 1988. ‘Models of sensory deprivation: The nature/nurture dichotomy and spatial representation in the blind’ , International Journal of Behavioral De- velopment 11, 1: 69–87. (date of access: 12 Jan. 2013).

Mol, Lisette, Emiel Krahmer, Alfons Maes and Marc Swerts. 2009. ‘The communicat- ive import of gestures: Evidence from a comparative analysis of human-human and human-machine interactions’ , Gesture 9, 1: 97–126. (date of access: 13 Jan. 2013).

Müller, Cornelia. 1998. Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte, Theorie, Sprachver- gleich. Berlin, Germany: Berlin-Verlag Spitz.

Müller, Cornelia. 2008. ‘What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor’ , in: Alan J. Cienki and Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, the Neth- erlands: John Benjamins Publishing, 219–248.

Murphy, Gregory L. 1997. ‘Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric rep- resentation’ , Cognition 62, 1: 99–108. (date of access: 2 Oct. 2012).

Murphy, Gregory L. 2004. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Myung, In Jae and Mark A. Pitt. 1997. ‘Applying Occam’s razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach’ , Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, 1: 79–95. (date of ac- cess: 25 Mar. 2013).

Owen, Adrian M., Martin R. Coleman, Melanie Boly, Matthew H. Davis, Steven Laureys and John D. Pickard. 2006. ‘Detecting awareness in the vegetative state’ , Science 313, 5792: 1402–1402. (date of access: 10 Mar. 2013).

Paivio, Allan. 1971. Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Win- ston.

Paivio, Allan. 1991. ‘Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status.’ , Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie 45, 3: 255.

Pfaff, Kerry L., Raymond W. Gibbs and Michael Johnson. 1997. ‘Metaphor in using and understanding euphemism and dysphemism’ , Applied Psycholinguistics 18, 01: 59–83.

Pinker, Steven. 1997. ‘Words and rules in the human brain’ , Nature 387: 547–548.

185

Piskorska, Agnieszka, Tomasz Krzeszowski and Bogusław Marek. 2008. Uczeń z dys- funkcją wzroku na lekcji angielskiego: wskazówki metodyczne dla nauczycieli. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.

Poeppel, David and David Embick. 2005. ‘Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience’ , in: Anne Cutler (ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 103–118.

Popper, Karl R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London and New York: Basic Books.

Posner, MI and SW Keele. 1970. ‘Time and space as measures of mental operations’ , in: Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Clare Cook and Olaf Hauk. 2012. ‘Inflection in action: Se- mantic motor system activation to noun- and verb-containing phrases is modu- lated by the presence of overt grammatical markers’ , NeuroImage 60, 2: 1367– 1379. (date of access: 11 Mar. 2013).

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Yury Shtyrov and Risto Ilmoniemi. 2005. ‘Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition’ , Journal of Cognitive Neuros- cience 17, 6: 884–892. (date of access: 11 Mar. 2013).

Quinn, Paul C. and Peter D. Eimas. 2000. ‘The emergence of category representations during infancy: Are separate perceptual and conceptual processes required?’ , Journal of Cognition and Development 1, 1: 55–61. (date of access: 12 Feb. 2013).

Radden, Günter, Klaus-Michael Köpke, Thomas Berg and Peter Siemund (eds.). 2007. Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.

Rakova, Marina. 2002. ‘The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay?’ , Cognitive Linguistics 13, 3: 215–244. (date of access: 28 Nov. 2012).

Ramachandran, Vilanayur S. (ed.). 2002. Encyclopedia of the Human Brain. (1st edi- tion.) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Reddy, Michael J. 1979. ‘The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our lan- guage about language’ , in: Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–201.

Regier, Terry. 1996. The human semantic potential: Spatial language and constrained connectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Reinholz, Julia and Stefan Pollmann. 2005. ‘Differential activation of object-selective visual areas by passive viewing of pictures and words’ , Cognitive Brain Re- search 24, 3: 702–714. (date of access: 14 Mar. 2013).

186

Rieser, John J., Daniel H. Ashmead, Charles R. Talor and Grant A. Youngquist. 1990. ‘Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets’ , Perception 19, 5: 675 – 689. (date of access: 3 May. 2013).

Ritchie, David. 2003. ‘ARGUMENT IS WAR - Or is it a game of chess? Multiple meanings in the analysis of implicit metaphors’ , Metaphor and Symbol 18, 2: 125–146. (date of access: 9 May. 2013).

Rizzolatti, Giacomo and Laila Craighero. 2004. ‘The mirror-neuron system’ , Annual Review of Neuroscience 27: 169–192. (date of access: 28 Nov. 2012).

Robbins, Philip and Murat Aydede. 2009. ‘A short primer on situated cognition’ , in: Murat Aydede and Philip Robbins (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–10. (http://sites.google.- com/site/philipmovealpha/short_primer.pdf) (date of access: 13 Feb. 2013).

Roch-Levecq, Anne-Catherine. 2006. ‘Production of basic emotions by children with congenital blindness: Evidence for the embodiment of theory of mind’ , British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, 3: 507–528. (date of access: 28 Apr. 2013).

Rohrer, Tim. 2001. ‘Understanding through the body: fMRI and ERP investigations into the neurophysiology of cognitive semantics’ , in: Santa Barbara: University of California at Santa Barbara.

Rohrer, Tim. 2005. ‘Image schemata in the brain’ , in: Beate Hampe and Joseph E. Grady (eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguist- ics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 165–196.

Rosch, Eleanor H. 1973. ‘Natural categories’ , Cognitive Psychology 4, 3: 328–350. (date of access: 11 Mar. 2013).

Rosch, Eleanor H. 1999. ‘Principles of categorization’ , in: Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: core readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 189– 206.

Rosch, Eleanor H. 2011. ‘“Slow Lettuce”: categories, concepts, fuzzy sets, and logical deduction’ , in: Radim Bělohlávek and George J. Klir (eds.), Concepts and Fuzzy Logic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89.

Rosch, Eleanor H. and Carolyn B Mervis. 1975. ‘Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories’ , Cognitive Psychology 7, 4: 573–605. (date of access: 13 Mar. 2013).

Rosch, Eleanor H., Carolyn B Mervis, Wayne D Gray, David M Johnson and Penny Boyes-Braem. 1976. ‘Basic objects in natural categories’ , Cognitive Psychology 8, 3: 382–439. (date of access: 13 Mar. 2013).

187

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. 1997. ‘Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction’ , Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies 19, 1: 281–295.

Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José and Lorena Pérez Hernández. 2011. ‘The Con- temporary Theory of Metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges’ , Meta- phor and Symbol 26, 3: 161–185. (date of access: 1 Oct. 2012).

Rumelhart, David E. and James L. McClelland. 1987. ‘Learning the past tenses of Eng- lish verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing?’ , in: Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language aquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, Eng- land: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 195–248.

Sáenz, Francisco Santibáñez. 1998. ‘Constraints on metaphor: some notes on the role of the Invariance Principle in metaphoric mappings’ , Revista española de lingüística aplicada , 13: 177–188. (date of access: 19 Mar. 2013).

Sato, Marc, Christian Cavé, Lucie Ménard and Annie Brasseur. 2010. ‘Auditory-tactile speech perception in congenitally blind and sighted adults’ , Neuropsychologia 48, 12: 3683–3686. (date of access: 29 Apr. 2013).

Savoy, Robert L. 2001. ‘History and future directions of human brain mapping and functional neuroimaging’ , Acta Psychologica 107, 1: 9–42. (date of access: 16 Mar. 2013).

Sawyer, R. Keith. 2002. ‘Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-re- ductionist science’ , Human Development 45, 1: 2–28. (date of access: 25 Mar. 2013).

Schellhammer, Ingo, Joachim Diederich, Michael Towsey and Claudia Brugman. 1998. ‘Knowledge extraction and recurrent neural networks: An analysis of an Elman network trained on a natural language learning task’ , in: David M.W. Powers (ed.), Proceedings of the joint conference on new methods in language pro- cessing and computational natural language learning: NeMLaP3/CoNLL98. Sydney: N.S.W., 73–78. (http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W98/W98-1209.pdf) (date of access: 25 Mar. 2013).

Schön, Donald. 1979. ‘Generative metaphors in the setting of social policy problems’ , in: Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- versity Press.

Schroeder, Charles E. and John Foxe. 2005. ‘Multisensory contributions to low-level, “unisensory” processing’ , Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15, 4: 454–458. (date of access: 18 Mar. 2013).

Searle, J.R. 1979. ‘Metaphor’ , in: Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.

188

Semin, Gün R. and Eliot R. Smith. 2008. ‘Introducing embodied grounding’ , in: Gün R. Semin and Eliot R. Smith (eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affect- ive, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sharkey, William F., Paula Asamoto, Christine Tokunaga, Gail Haraguchi and Tammy McFaddon-Robar. 2000. ‘Hand gestures of visually impaired and sighted inter- actants’ , Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 94, 9: 549–563. (date of access: 9 Jan. 2013).

Sharkey, William F. and Laura Stafford. 1990. ‘Turn‐taking resources employed by congenitally blind conversers’ , Communication Studies 41, 2: 161–182. (date of access: 9 Jan. 2013).

Simpson, John and Edmund Weiner (eds.). 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. (2nd edition.) London: Clarendon Press.

Smith, Edward E. and Douglas L. Medin. 1981. Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Stroop, R.J. 1935. ‘Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions’ , Journal of Experi- mental Psychology 18, 6: 643–662.

Sweetser, Eve. 2008. ‘What does it mean to compare language and gesture? Modalities and contrasts’ , in: Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin- Tripp, Keiko Nakamura and Seyda Ozcaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Ap- proaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. Psychology Press Festschrift Series, New York: Psychology Press.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2000a. ‘Senses, perception and metaphors (of Object and Objec- tification)’ , in: Stanisław Puppel and Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (eds.), Multibus vocibus de lingua. W czterdziestolecie pracy naukowo-dydaktycznej Profesora Jacka Fisiaka (1959 – 1999). Poznań: Wydział Neofilologii UAM, 143–153.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2000b. ‘The ontology of metaphors: the sense of touch in lan- guage formation’ , The ontology of metaphors: the sense of touch in language formation Scripta Periodica, 4: 193–199.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2002. ‘Objectification: From object perception to metaphor cre- ation’ , in: Krystyna Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and K. Turewicz (eds.), Cognit- ive Linguistics Today. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang, 159–175.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2004. ‘Objectification in metaphorical processes—some philo- sophical issues’ , Lingua Posnaniensis 46: 121–130.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2005. ‘Obiektyfikacja jako podstawa metaforyzacji’ , Obiekty- fikacja jako podstawa metaforyzacji Kognitywistyka: 231–239.

189

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2008. ‘Objectification: a new theory of metaphor’ , in: M. Thormählen (ed.), English Now: Selected Papers from the 20th IAUPE Confer- ence in Lund 2007. Lund: Lund Studies in English, 308–317.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2009. ‘Are prepositions metaphorical?’ , in: W. Oleksy and P. Stalmaszczyk (eds.), Cognitive approaches to language and linguistic data. Studies in honor of Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang, 171–180.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2010. ‘What is concrete and what is abstract in love is a journey metaphor’ , in: Aleksander Szwedek (ed.), Points of View. Studies in Culture, Literature and Language. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwa Kujawsko-Pomorskiej Szkoły Wyższej w Bydgoszczy, 97–110.

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2011. ‘The ultimate source domain’ , Review of Cognitive Lin- guistics 9, 2: 341–366.

Tadeusiewicz, Ryszard. 1974. ‘Wybrane zagadnienia cyfrowego modelowania frag- mentów systemu nerwowego.’ , in: Materiały II Ogólnopolskiego Sympozjum: System - Modelowanie -Sterowanie. Zakopane, 112–114.

Talmy, Leonard. 1983. How language structures space. Berkeley: Cognitive Science Program, Institute of Cognitive Studies, University of California at Berkeley.

Taub, Sarah F. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Terai, Asuka and Robert L. Goldstone. 2011. ‘Processing emergent features in metaphor comprehension’ , in: L. Carlson, C. Holscher and T. Shipley (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Austin, TX: Cognit- ive Science Society, 2043–2048.

Thagard, Paul. 2005. Mind: Introduction To Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thomas, Michael S. C., Denis Mareschal and A.C. Hinds. 2001. ‘A connectionist ac- count of the emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children’ , in: Johanna D. Moore and Keith Stenning (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Edinburgh: Cognit- ive Science Society. (http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/4606/) (date of access: 30 Nov. 2012).

Thomas, Michael S.C. and Denis Mareschal. 2001. ‘Metaphor as categorisation: A con- nectionist implementation’ , Metaphor and Symbol , 16 (1-2): 5–27. (date of ac- cess: 13 Mar. 2013).

190

Tomaszewski, P and P Rosik. 2002. ‘Czy polski jezyk migowy jest prawdziwym jezykiem?’ , in: G. Jastrzebowska and Z. Tarkowski (eds.), Człowiek wobec ograniczeń. Niepełnosprawność. Komunikacja. Lublin: Terapia, 133–165.

Turner, Mark. 1990. ‘Aspects of the invariance hypothesis’ , Cognitive Linguistics 1, 2: 247–255.

Turner, Mark. 2005. ‘The literal versus figurative dichotomy’ , in: Seana Coulson and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), The literal and nonliteral in lan- guage and thought. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang, 25–52. (http://papers.ssrn.- com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1293767) (date of access: 13 Dec. 2012).

Ungar, Simon, Mark Blades and Christopher Spencer. 1996. ‘The construction of cog- nitive maps by children with visual impairments’ , in: Juval Portugali (ed.), The construction of cognitive maps. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 247– 273.

Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguist- ics. (2nd edition.) Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Utsumi, Akira. 2005. ‘The role of feature emergence in metaphor appreciation’ , Meta- phor and Symbol 20, 3: 151–172. (date of access: 9 Nov. 2012).

Valenzuela, Javier and Cristina Soriano. 2005. ‘Cognitive metaphor and empirical meth- ods’ , Barcelona Language and Literature Studies 14.

Vervaeke, John and John M. Kennedy. 1996. ‘Metaphors in language and thought: falsi- fication and multiple meanings’ , Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11, 4: 273– 284. (date of access: 2 Oct. 2012).

Vervaeke, John and John M. Kennedy. 2004. ‘Conceptual metaphor and abstract thought’ , Metaphor and Symbol 19, 3: 213–231. (date of access: 1 Oct. 2012).

West, W. Caroline and Phillip J. Holcomb. 2000. ‘Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: an electrophysiological investigation’ , Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 6: 1024–1037. (date of access: 16 Mar. 2013).

Westermann, Gert, Denis Mareschal, Mark Johnson, S. Sirois, M. W. Spratling and Mi- chael S. C. Thomas. 2006. ‘Neuroconstructivism’ , Developmental science 10, 1: 75–83. (date of access: 30 Nov. 2012).

Whatmough, Christine, Louis Verret, Dion Fung and Howard Chertkow. 2004. ‘Com- mon and contrasting areas of activation for abstract and concrete concepts: An H215O PET study’ , Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16, 7: 1211–1226. (date of access: 14 Mar. 2013).

191

Zarate, Michael A and Eliot R Smith. 1990. ‘Person categorization and stereotyping’ , Social Cognition 8, 2: 161–185.

Zawilinska, Malgorzata. 2013. ‘Glistening sounds, prickly vocals and juicy music–an analysis of sense transfers to the target domain of sound in Polish synaesthetic metaphors.’

Zwaan, Rolf A. and Lawrence J. Taylor. 2006. ‘Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension’ , Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135, 1: 1–11. (date of access: 16 Mar. 2013).

192

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.