Pete Wells’s NY Times restaurant review
has all the moral (and aesthetic) depth
of a mid 18th-century southern US erotic cotton-underwear fancier’s
sneering assessment
of erotic synthetic-cotton underwear
from an abolitionist manufacturer.
Stevan Harnad
Pete Wells’s NY Times restaurant review
has all the moral (and aesthetic) depth
of a mid 18th-century southern US erotic cotton-underwear fancier’s
sneering assessment
of erotic synthetic-cotton underwear
from an abolitionist manufacturer.