It is hard to say whose brand of betrayal is the most repugnant: that of the pitiless pedants, or the well-meaners purporting to be prolonging sufferers’ pain to protect others, or the metaphysical monsters who solemnly invoke the sanctity of the “right” of another to continue suffering on account of an article of faith to which the monster subscribes but the sufferer does not.
The sociopathic sanctimony of those who raise the slightest justification for the unforgivable denial of Chantal Sébire‘s escape from her relentless suffering is beyond words.
Sarkozy, meanwhile, confirms both his jadedness and his jejuneness.