This site has been permanently archived. This is a static copy provided by the University of Southampton.

Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Stevan Harnad <harnad_at_COGSCI.SOTON.AC.UK>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 08:35:06 -0400

My reply to Arthur Smith's last posting will be found on a new thread:
"Online Self-Archiving: Distincguishing the Optimal from the Optional."

Stevan Harnad
Received on Wed Feb 10 1999 - 19:17:43 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stevan Harnad: "Online Self-Archiving: Distinguishing the Optimal from the Optional"
Previous message: Marvin Margoshes: "Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K"
Maybe in reply to: Thomas J. Walker: "2.0K vs. 0.2K"
Next in thread: Steve Hitchcock: "Re: 2.0K vs. 0.2K"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:45:31 GMT