This site has been permanently archived. This is a static copy provided by the University of Southampton.
In the 80, when we used several different biological, biomedical and
chemical databases at the same time, for our bibliographic researches (via
Dialog for example) we had a lot of doubles in the results but this problem
has been finally solved : no doubt that researches in repositories will be
improved on the same way .....as soon as repositories are filled up.
H�l�ne Bosc
From: "Chanier Thierry" <thierry.chanier_at_UNIV-FCOMTE.FR>
To: <AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM_at_LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Repositories: Institutional or Central ? [in French, from
Rector's blog, U. Li�ge]
[...]Now I give to colleagues the OAISTER URL (with the path to follow) to
get
all my publications (because some of them are in other archives).
The problem is : deposits in Edutice appear twice in the OAISTER list (as
deposits of Edutice and of HAL - but there is one only deposit).
It is a concrete exemple of progress which should be made to avoid
repetitions in harvesters (among many other new features).
Received on Thu Feb 05 2009 - 22:02:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Dec 10 2010 - 19:49:39 GMT