Following the LOCKSS principle,�I�personally support both
institutional and central repositories. Depositing in both may also
help to disseminate research more widely.
�
Being Devil's advocate however, I can understand why research funding
agencies�would want�to stipulate specific�central repositories in
their OA mandates. If you are serious about policing compliance, it
is much simpler for a research funder to monitor�a central repository
than a myriad of institutional repositories.
�
Of course for institutional mandates it is the other way round.
�
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Peter Millington
SHERPA Technical Development Officer
Greenfield Medical�Library, <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />University of
Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet/�- Research funders' open access
policies
�
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ - Publishers' copyright and archiving
policies
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage
your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks.
Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be
monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
Received on Fri Feb 13 2009 - 13:33:55 GMT