Connectionist modelling of lexical segmentation and vocabulary acquisition

Davis, Matt H. (2002) Connectionist modelling of lexical segmentation and vocabulary acquisition. [Book Chapter] (In Press)

Full text available as:

[img] PDF


Adults typically hear sentences in their native language as a sequence of separate words and we might therefeore assume, that words in speech are physically separated in the way that they are perceived. However, when listening to an unfamiliar language we no longer experience sequences of discrete words, but rather hear a continuous stream of speech with boundaries separating individual sentences or utterances. Theories of how adult listeners segment the speech stream into words emphasise the role that knowledge of individual words plays in the segmentation of speech. However, since words can not be learnt until the speech stream can be segmented, it seems unlikely that infants will be able to use word recognition to segment connected speech. For this reason, researchers have proposed a variety of strategies and cues that infants could use to identify word boundaries without being able to recognise the words that these boundaries delimit. This chapter, describes some computational simulations proposing ways in which these cues and strategies for the acquisition of lexical segmentation can be integrated with the infants’ acquisition of the meanings of words. The simulations reported here describe simple computational mechanisms and knowledge sources that may support these different aspects of language acquisition.

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:Lexical Segmentation, Vocabulary Acquisition, Simple Recurrent Network, Connectionist Modelling, Language Acquisition, Spoken Word Recognition
Subjects:Psychology > Developmental Psychology
Neuroscience > Neurolinguistics
Psychology > Psycholinguistics
ID Code:2306
Deposited By: Davis, Matthew H.
Deposited On:03 Jul 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Allen, J., & Christiansen, M. H. (1996). Integrating multiple cues in word segmentation: a connectionist model using hints. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the

18th Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Aslin, R. N., Woodward, J. Z., La Mendola, N. P. & Bever, T. G. (1996) Models of word segmentation in fluent speech to infants. In J. L. Morgan, & K. Demuth,(Eds) Signal to syntax: bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early

acquisition, pp. 117-134. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.

Baillargeon. R. (1995) Physical reasoning in infancy. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed). The Cognitive Neurosciences. (pp.181-204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Baldwin, D. A. (1991) Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development, 62, 875-890.

Baldwin, D. A. (1993) Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference. Journal of Child Language, 20, 395-418.

Barry, W. J. (1981). Internal juncture and speech communication. In W. J. Barry & K. J. Kohler (Eds.), Beitrage zur experimentalen und angewandten phonetik .

Bloom, P. (1994). Possible names: the role of syntax-semantics mappings in the acquisition of nominals. Lingua, 92, 297-329.

Brent, M. R. (1999). Speech segmentation and word discovery: a computational perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 294-301.

Brent, M. R., & Cartwright, T. A. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61, 93-125.

Bullinaria, J.A. (2001). Simulating the evolution of modular neural systems. In Moore, J. D. & Stenning, K. Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society p.146-153.

Cairns, P., Shillcock, R., Chater, N., & Levy, J. (1997). Bootstrapping word boundaries: a bottom-up corpus based approach to speech segmentation. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 111-153.

Charles-Luce, J, & Luce, P. A. (1995) An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children's receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language, 22, 727-735.

Christiansen, M. H., Allen, J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Learning to segment speech using multiple cues: a connectionist model. Language and Cognitive Processes,

13, 221-268.

Cole, R. A., & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Crick, F. H. C. (1989) The recent excitement about neural networks. Nature, 337, 129-132.

Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133-142.

Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.

Davis, M. H., Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997) Recognising embedded words in connected speech: context and competition. In J. Bullinaria, D. Glasspool, & G. Houghton (Eds), Proceedings of the Fourth Neural Computation in Psychology Workshop. London: Springer-Verlag.

Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Gaskell, M. G. (2002) Leading up the lexical garden-path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal

of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 218-244.

Dominey, P.F., & Ramus, F. (2000) Neural network processing of natural language: I. Sensitivity to serial, temporal and abstract structure of language in the infant. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 87-127

Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. & Vigorito, J. (1971) Speech perception in early infancy, Science, 171, 304-306.

Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179-211.

Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71-99.

Elman, J., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking Innateness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fahlman, S. E., & Lebiere, C. (1990) The cascade correlation learning architecture. in D. Touretzky (Ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing, 2, Morgan-Kaufman.

Fernald, A. (1985) Four month old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behaviour and Development, 8, 181-195.

Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A., & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the second year. Psychological Science, 9, 228-231.

Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and

fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16, 477-501.

Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznik, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Perthick, S. J. (1994) Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society

for Research in Child Development, 59, Number 242.

Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson. (1997). Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 613-656.

Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1999). Ambiguity, competition and blending in spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 439-462.

Gasser, M. (1994). Modularity in a connectionist model of morphology acquisition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 15, 214-220.

Gleitman, L. R. (1994) Words, words, words. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 346, 71-77.

Goldowsky, B. N., & Newport, E. L. (1993). Modeling the effects of processing limitations on the acquisition of morphology: the less is more hypothesis. In E.

V. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Child Language Forum. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Cauley, K. M., Gordon, L. (1987). The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child

Language, 14, 23-45.

Harrington, J., Watson, G., & Cooper, M. (1989). Word boundary detection in broad class and phoneme strings. Computer Speech and Language, 3, 367-382.

Harris, Z. S. (1955). From phoneme to morpheme. Language, 31, 190-222.

Jusczyk, P. W. (1997) The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Jusczyk, P. W. (1999) How infants begin to extract words from speech. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 323-328.

Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1-23.

Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N. (1993a) Preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675-687.

Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M., Svenkerud, V. Y. & Jusczyk, A. M. (1993b) Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words.

Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402-420.

Jusczyk, P. W., & Hohne, E. A. (1997) Infants’ memory for spoken words. Science, 277, 1984-1985.

Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D. M., & Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159-207.

Korman, M. (1984) Adaptive aspects of maternal vocalizations in differing contexts at ten weeks. First Language, 5, 44-45.

Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N. & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.

Science, 255, 606-608.

Lehiste, I. (1960). An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. Phonetica, 5(supplement), 5-54.

McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.

Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., Vishton, P.M. (1999) Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.

Mareschal, D. (2000) Object knowledge in infancy: current controversies and approaches. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 408-416.

Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1984). Function and processing in spoken word recognition: a tutorial review. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processing. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.

Maskara, A. & Noetzel, W. (1993) Sequence recognition with recurrent neural networks. Connection Science, 5, 139-152.

Monsell, S., & Hirsh, K. W. (1998). Competitor priming in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1495-1520.

Norris, D. (1990). A dynamic-net model of human speech recognition. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.

Oviatt, S. L. (1980) The emerging ability to comprehend language: An experimental approach. Child Development, 51, 97-106.

O’Reilly, R.C. (1996) Biologically plausible error-driven learning using local activation differences: the generalized recirculation algorithm. Neural Computation, 8, 895-938.

Page, M. (2000). Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 443-512.

Pinker, S. (1989) Learnability and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Plunkett, K., Sinha, C., Møller, M. F., & Strandsby, O. (1992). Symbol grounding or the emergence of symbols? Vocabulary growth in children and a connectionist net. Connection Science, 4, 293-312.

Plaut, D. C., & Kello, C. T. (1998). The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The Emergence of Language. Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.

Quinn, P., Eimas, P., & Rosenkrantz, S. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3- and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 22, 463-475.

Roy, D. K., & Pentland, A. P. (2002) Learning words from sights and sounds: A computational model. Cognitive Science, 26, 113-146.

Rueckl, J. G., Cave, K. R. & Kosslyn, S. M. (1989) Why are "what" and "where" processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 171-186.

Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical language learning by 8 month olds. Science, 274, 1926-1928.

Schafer, G., & Plunkett, K. (1998) Rapid word-learning by 15 month olds under tightly-controlled conditions. Child Development, 69, 309-320.

Schafer, G., Plunkett, K. & Harris, P. L. (1999) What’s in a name? Lexical knowledge drives infants’ visual preferences in the absence of referent input. Developmental Science, 2, 187-194.

Servan-Schrieber, D., Cleeremans, A. & McClelland, J. L. (1991) Graded state machines: The representation of temporal contingencies in simple recurrent networks. Machine Learning, 7, 161-193.

Shastri, L., & Ajjanagadde, V. (1993) From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 16, 417-494

Shrager, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1996) Dynamic plasticity influences the emergence of function in a simple cortical array. Neural Networks, 9, 1119-1129.

Sirois, S., Buckingham, D., & Shultz, T. R. (2000). Artificial grammar learning by infants: An auto-associator perspective. Developmental Science, 4, 442-456.

Siskind, J. M. (1996) A computational study of cross-situational techniques for learning

word-to-meaning mappings. Cognition, 61, 39-91.

Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159-216.

Sougné, J. (1998). Connectionism and the problem of multiple instantiation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 183-189.

Stager, C. L. & Werker, J. F. (1997) Infants listen for more phonetic detailed in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381-382.

St. John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990) Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 217-257.

Swingley, D., Pinto, J. P., & Fernald, A. (1999). Continuous processing in word recognition at 24 months. Cognition, 71, 73-108.

Thomas D. G., Campos J. J., Shucard D. W., Ramsay D. S., & Shucard J. (1981) Semantic comprehension in infancy: A signal detection analysis. Child Development, 52, 798-903.

Tincoff, R. & Jusczyk, P. W. (1999) Some beginnings of word comprehension in 6-month-olds. Psychological Science, 10, 172-175.

Walley, A. (1993) The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286-350.

Waxman, S. & Markow, D. (1996) Words as an invitation to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-olds. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 257-302.

Werker, J. R. & Tees (1984) Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganisation during the first year of life. Infant Behaviour and Development,

7, 49-63.

Wolff, J. G. (1977). The discovery of segmentation in natural language. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 97-106.


Repository Staff Only: item control page