Cogprints

Can a machine be conscious? How?

Harnad, Stevan (2003) Can a machine be conscious? How? [Journal (Paginated)]

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:

[img] HTML
63Kb

Abstract

A "machine" is any causal physical system, hence we are machines, hence machines can be conscious. The question is: which kinds of machines can be conscious? Chances are that robots that can pass the Turing Test -- completely indistinguishable from us in their behavioral capacities -- can be conscious (i.e. feel), but we can never be sure (because of the "other-minds" problem). And we can never know HOW they have minds, because of the "mind/body" problem. We can only know how they pass the Turing Test, but not how, why or whether that makes them feel.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:artificial intelligence, consciousness, Turing Test, mind/body problem, other-mind problem, artificial life
Subjects:Neuroscience > Neural Modelling
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Computer Science > Robotics
Biology > Theoretical Biology
ID Code:2460
Deposited By: Harnad, Stevan
Deposited On:15 Sep 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cangelosi, A. & Harnad, S. (2001) The Adaptive Advantage of Symbolic Theft Over Sensorimotor Toil:Grounding Language in Perceptual Categories. Evolution of Communication 4(1) 117-142

http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/20/36/index.html

Cangelosi A., Greco A. & Harnad S. (2000). From robotic toil to symbolic theft: Grounding transfer from entry-level to higher-level categories. Connection Science12(2):143-162 http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/47/index.html

Harnad, S. (1982) Consciousness: An afterthought. Cognition and Brain Theory 5: 29 - 47. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/15/70/index.html

Harnad, S. (1990) The Symbol Grounding Problem Physica D 42: 335-346. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/06/15/index.html

Harnad, S. (1991) "Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem"Minds and Machines 1: 43-54.

http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/15/78/index.html

Harnad, S. (1992) The Turing Test Is Not A Trick: Turing Indistinguishability Is A Scientific Criterion. SIGART Bulletin 3(4) (October1992) pp. 9 - 10.

http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/15/84/index.html

Harnad, S. (1994) Levels of Functional Equivalence in Reverse Bioengineering: The Darwinian Turing Test for Artificial Life. Artificial Life

1(3): 293-301. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/15/91/index.html

Harnad, Stevan (1995) "Why and How We Are Not Zombies. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1:164-167 http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/01/index.html

Harnad, S. (2000) Minds, Machines, and Turing: The Indistinguishability of Indistinguishables. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 9(4): 425-445. (special issue on "Alan Turing and Artificial Intelligence") http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/16/index.html

Harnad, S. (2001) No Easy Way Out. The Sciences 41(2) 36-42. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/24/index.html

Harnad, S. (2002) Turing Indistinguishability and the Blind Watchmaker. In: J. Fetzer (ed.) Evolving Consciousness Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp 3-18 http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/15/index.html

Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 4, 515-526.

Shear, J. (Ed.) (1997) Explaining consciousness : the "hard problem." Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c1997.

Turing, A. M. (1950) Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 49:433-460. http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/04/99/index.html

Whiten, A. (Ed.) (1991). Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development, and simulation of everyday mindreading . Oxford: Blackwell.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.