Harnad, Stevan (2008) Why and How the Problem of the Evolution of Universal Grammar (UG) is Hard. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)] (In Press)
Full text available as:
![]() |
HTML (Longer Version)
- Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. 30Kb |
![]() |
Other (Longer version (RTF))
- Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. 33Kb |
![]() |
HTML (Published version (shorter))
- Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. 22Kb |
Abstract
Universal Grammar (UG) is a complicated set of grammatical rules that underlies our grammatical capacity. We all follow the rules of UG, but we were never taught them, and we could not have learned them from trial and error experience either (not enough data, or time). So UG must be inborn. But for similar reasons, it seems implausible that UG was “learned” by trial and error evolution either: What was the variation and competition? And what were UG’s adaptive advantages? So this leaves the hard problem of explaining where our brain’s UG capacity came from. Christiansen & Chater (C&C) suggest an answer: Language is an organism, like us, and our brains were not selected for UG capacity; rather, languages were selected for learnability with minimal trial and error experience by our brains. This explanation is circular: Where did our brains’ selective capacity to learn all and only UG-compliant languages come from? Chomsky suggests it might be a combination of optimality and logical necessity.
Item Type: | Journal (On-line/Unpaginated) |
---|---|
Keywords: | evolution, language, universal grammar, chomsky, poverty of the stimulus, learnability, adapative advantage |
Subjects: | Linguistics > Syntax Biology > Evolution Psychology > Evolutionary Psychology |
ID Code: | 6008 |
Deposited By: | Harnad, Stevan |
Deposited On: | 07 Apr 2008 21:06 |
Last Modified: | 11 Mar 2011 08:57 |
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- ASCII Citation
- Atom
- BibTeX
- Dublin Core
- EP3 XML
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- EndNote
- HTML Citation
- ID Plus Text Citation
- JSON
- METS
- MODS
- MPEG-21 DIDL
- OpenURL ContextObject
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- RDF+N-Triples
- RDF+N3
- RDF+XML
- Refer
- Reference Manager
- Search Data Dump
- Simple Metadata
- YAML
Repository Staff Only: item control page