Cogprints

Decision-making and strategic thinking through analogies

Linhares, Dr Alexandre (2008) Decision-making and strategic thinking through analogies. [Preprint]

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
 PDF - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
800Kb

Abstract

When faced with a complex scenario, how does understanding arise in one’s mind? How does one integrate disparate cues into a global, meaningful whole? Consider the chess game: how do humans avoid the combinatorial explosion? How are abstract ideas represented? The purpose of this paper is to propose a new computational model of human chess intuition and intelligence. We suggest that analogies and abstract roles are crucial to solving these landmark problems. We present a proof-of-concept model, in the form of a computational architecture, which may be able to account for many crucial aspects of human intuition, such as (i) concentration of attention to relevant aspects, (ii) how humans may avoid the combinatorial explosion, (iii) perception of similarity at a strategic level, and (iv) a state of meaningful anticipation over how a global scenario may evolve.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:perception problem-solving chess cognitive-science artificial-intelligence copycat
Subjects:Psychology > Perceptual Cognitive Psychology
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Electronic Publishing > Peer Review
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science > Machine Vision
ID Code:6138
Deposited By: Linhares, Dr Alexandre
Deposited On:24 Jul 2008 10:11
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Atkinson, G., (1993). Chess and machine intuition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

Ban, J. (1997) The tactics of endgames. Dover.

Chalmers, D.J., French, R.M., Hofstadter, D.R. (1992) High-level perception, representation, and analogy: a critique of artificial intelligence methodology. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 4 (3), 185-211.

Chase, W.G., and Simon, H.A., (1973). ‘Perception in Chess’, Cognitive Psychology 4, 55-81.

Charness N, Reingold, EM, Pomplun M, Stampe DM, (2001). ‘The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: evidence from eye movements.’ Memory & Cognition, 29, 1146-1152.

Foundalis, H. (2006) PHAEACO: a cognitive architecture inspired by Bongard’s problems. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.

French, R.M., (1995) The Subtlety of Sameness, MIT Press.

Gobet, F., (1998). Expert memory: a comparison of four theories, Cognition, 66, 115-152.

Gobet, F., Lane, P.C.R., Croker, S., Cheng, P.C-H., Jones, G., Oliver, I., Pine, J.M., (2001). ‘Chunking mechanisms in human learning’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 236-243.

de Groot, A.D., (1965). Thought and choice in chess. New York: Mouton.

Hawkins, J. (2005) On Intelligence, Holt Paperbacks.

Hofstadter, D.R., (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid. New York: Basic Books.

Hofstadter, D.R., (1985). Metamagical themas. New York: Basic Books.

Hofstadter, D.R., and FARG, (1995). Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought, New York: Basic Books.

Hofstadter, D.R., (2001) Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In: The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, ed. D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak & B. N. Kokinov, pp. 499–538. MIT Press.

Klein, G., (1999) Sources of Power: how people make decisions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Linhares, A. (2000) A glimpse at the metaphysics of Bongard problems, Artificial Intelligence 121, 251-270.

Linhares, A. (2005) An active symbols theory of chess intuition, Minds and Machines, 15, 131-181.

Linhares, A. (2008) Dynamic sets of potentially interchangeable connotations: A theory of mental objects. Accepted for publication, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Linhares, A., and P. Brum (2007) Understanding our understanding of strategic scenarios: what role do chunks play? Cognitive Science 31 (6) 989—1007.

Marshall, J. (1999) Metacat: a self-watching cognitive architecture for analogy-making and high level perception. PhD thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.

McGraw, G., (1995) Letter Spirit (part one): emergent high-level perception of letters using fluid concepts. PhD Thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.

McGregor, S.J., & Howes, A. (2002) The Role of attack and defense semantics in skilled player’s memory for chess positions. Memory and Cognition, 30, 707-717.

Mitchell, M., (1993) Analogy-Making as Perception, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Mitchell, M., and Hofstadter, D.R., (1990) ‘The emergence of understanding in a computer model of concepts and analogy-making’. Physica D, vol. 42, 322-334.

Moore, G. (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8), April 19. Available online at ftp://download.intel.com/museum/Moores_Law/Articles-Press_Releases/Gordon_Moore_1965_Article.pdf

Myers, D.G. (2002) Intuition: its powers and perils. Yale University Press, New Haven.

Rehling, J.A. (2001). Letter spirit (part two): modeling creativity in a visual domain. PhD Thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.

Silva, J., and Linhares, A., (2007) Cognitive reflection: the ‘premature temperature convergence’ hypothesis, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, USA.

Wilkins, D., (1980). ‘Using patterns and plans in chess’, Artificial Intelligence, 14, 165-203.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.