Cogprints

Tracing the Biological Roots of Knowledge

Nagarjuna, G. (2006) Tracing the Biological Roots of Knowledge. [Book Chapter] (In Press)

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
 PDF
796Kb

Abstract

The essay is a critical review of three possible approaches in the theory of knowledge while tracing the biological roots of knowledge: empiricist, rationalist and developmentalist approaches. Piaget's genetic epistemology, a developmentalist approach, is one of the first comprehensive treatments on the question of tracing biological roots of knowledge. This developmental approach is currently opposed, without questioning the biological roots of knowledge, by the more popular rationalist approach, championed by Chomsky. Developmental approaches are generally coherent with cybernetic models, of which the theory of autopoiesis proposed by Maturana and Varela made a significant theoretical move in proposing an intimate connection between metabolism and knowledge. Modular architecture is currently considered more or less an undisputable model for both biology as well as cognitive science. By suggesting that modulation of modules is possible by motor coordination, a proposal is made to account for higher forms of conscious cognition within the four distinguishable layers of the human mind. Towards the end, the problem of life and cognition is discussed in the context of the evolution of complex cognitive systems, suggesting the unique access of phylogeny during the ontogeny of human beings as a very special case, and how the problem cannot be dealt with independent of the evolution of coding systems in nature.

Item Type:Book Chapter
Keywords:epistemology, Piaget, Chomsky, genetic epistemology, biological roots of cognition, knowledge, cognitive development, rationalism, empiricism, constructivism, Fodor, modularity, modulation, mind, cognitive science, autopoiesis
Subjects:Psychology > Developmental Psychology
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy > Epistemology
ID Code:4896
Deposited By: G., Nagarjuna
Deposited On:30 May 2006
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:56

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Anderson JR 1983 The Architecture of Cognition Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Barbieri M 2003 The Organic Codes: An Introduction to Semantic Biology Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Bateson G 1979 Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity Bantom Books, Toronto.

Carey S and Gelman R (eds) 1991 The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition Erlbaum Hillsdale: New Jersey.

Carruthers P 2005 The case for massively modular models of mind, In Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science ed R Stainton Blackwell.

Chomsky N 1988 Language and Problems of Knowledge MIT Press: Cambridge.

Coffa JA 1991 The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Cosmides L and Tooby J 1994 Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity and Culture pp. 85­116 eds L

Hirschfeld and S Gelman Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Donald M 1991 Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Harward University Press: Cambridge.

Eigen M & Schuster P 1979 The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self­Organization Springer­Verlag: Berlin.

Fodor JA 1983 Modularity of Mind MIT Press: Cambridge.

Fodor JA 2000 The Mind Doesn’t Work that Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology MIT Press: Cambridge.

Gärdenfors P 2003 How Homo became Sapiens?: On the Evolution of Thinking. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Hirschfeld L and Gelman S (eds) 1994 Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Karmiloff­Smith A 1992 Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science MIT Press: Cambridge.

Kuhn TS 1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago University Press: Chicago.

Mandler JM 2004 The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Marr D 1982 Vision W.H. Freeman: California.

Maturana H & Varela F 1987 The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Understanding. New Science Library: Boston.

Nagarjuna G 1994 The Role of Inversion in the Genesis, Development and the Structure of Scientific Knowledge Ph.D. thesis Indian Institute of Technology: Kanpur, India.

Nagarjuna G 2005a From Folklore to Science International History, Philosophy, Sociology & Science Teaching Conference, Leeds (July 2005).

Nagarjuna G 2005b Muscularity of Mind: Towards an Explanation of the Transition from Unconscious to Conscious Annual Conference of the European Society for Philosophy and Psychology Lund, Sweden (August) Preprint http://cogprints.org/4352/

Passmore J 1968 A hundred years of Philosophy Penguin.

Penrose R 1989 The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford University Press: New York.

Penrose R 1994 Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness Oxford University Press: New York.

Piaget J 1972a Biology and Knowledge: An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.

Piaget J 1972b The Principles of Genetic Epistemology Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.

Piattelli­Palmarini M (ed) 1980 Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

Pinker S 1997 How the Mind Works Norton: New York.

Simon H 1962 The Architecture of Complexity Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 162 467–482.

Sperber D 1994 Modularity of Thought and the Epidemiology of Representations, In Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture pp. 39­67 ed L Hirschfeld and S Gelman Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Varela F and Goguen J 1977 The Arithmetic of Closure. In Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vol III pp. 48­63 ed R Trappl Wiley Hemisphere: New York.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.