Monday, June 17. 2013Publisher Double Dealing on OATrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Bjorn Brembs asks "Do you know if it would still be legal to automate the "request a copy" button such that author's institutions handle it for them in an automated way?
If that were the case, could that be used to allow access to back-archives of toll-access articles, in lieu of (or complementing) ILL?" REPLY: No, it wouldn't be legal. Reprint requests can only be legally fulfilled by the author. Otherwise it's 3rd-party republication or bootleg... |
QuicksearchMaterials You Are Invited To Use To Promote OA Self-Archiving:
Videos:
The American Scientist Open Access Forum has been chronicling and often directing the course of progress in providing Open Access to Universities' Peer-Reviewed Research Articles since its inception in the US in 1998 by the American Scientist, published by the Sigma Xi Society. The Forum is largely for policy-makers at universities, research institutions and research funding agencies worldwide who are interested in institutional Open Acess Provision policy. (It is not a general discussion group for serials, pricing or publishing issues: it is specifically focussed on institutional Open Acess policy.)
You can sign on to the Forum here.
ArchivesCalendar
CategoriesBlog AdministrationStatisticsLast entry: 2018-09-14 13:27
1129 entries written
238 comments have been made
Top Referrers |