Multimodal Semiotics of Spiritual Experiences: Representing Beliefs, Metaphors, and Actions

Evola, Vito (2008) Multimodal Semiotics of Spiritual Experiences: Representing Beliefs, Metaphors, and Actions. [Conference Paper] (Unpublished)

Full text available as:

PDF (Paper) - Presentation


Traditionally, spiritual experiences have been considered "ineffable," but metaphors pervade the representations of certain concepts of the transcendental in an attempt to talk about such abstract ideas. Whether it be during the description of a vision or simply talking about morality, people use conceptual metaphors to reason and talk about these concepts. Many representations of God, spirits, or the afterlife are culturally based, but whereas some may differ based on individual experiences, others seem to have a more universal character. From a phenomenological point of view, it seems that the descriptions are contingent and not necessary, that is, the language a believer is exposed to may influence, but not condition a priori, his or her own spiritual experience as Constructivists have thought. People's views about themselves and the world around them are deeply rooted in their conceptual systems, which are created by their experiences and their bodily interactions with the world, whether it's having to do with gravity in the case of UP and DOWN, or what our individual and social concepts are. When people talk about religious and spiritual concepts, they are revealing a great deal about their world and themselves and the way they interact with it. Concepts dealing with people's system of beliefs are very "meaningful" for the individual, and the more entrenched a frame of mind is, the less plastic it is, a fact confirmed by the neurosciences, which claim that it is difficult to break down and reconstruct certain synaptic structures of the brain. How do today's common "faithful" relate to certain metaphors about spiritual concepts transmitted by their faiths? What do these metaphors say about the individuals' concepts of themselves and their world? I will explore some of my own conclusions concerning conceptual metaphors and figurative language collected in various sacred texts and during a series of interviews of religious people with different backgrounds of religious systems. The data include linguistic expressions as well as gesture. Moreover, the interviewees were asked to draw on paper certain experiences of religious nature and then to describe their pictures. My investigation will try to shed new light on the phenomenology of religious experiences and personhood, using cognitive linguistics as a prime tool of analysis.

Item Type:Conference Paper
Keywords:metaphor, religion, God, paradise, speech, gesture, drawings, multimodality, semiotics, cognitive linguistics, phenomenology
Subjects:Psychology > Behavioral Analysis
Philosophy > Logic
Philosophy > Metaphysics
Psychology > Psycholinguistics
Psychology > Behavioral Analysis
Psychology > Applied Cognitive Psychology
Philosophy > Ethics
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Linguistics > Semantics
Psychology > Social Psychology
Psychology > Perceptual Cognitive Psychology
Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
Philosophy > Philosophy of Language
ID Code:6112
Deposited By: Evola, Dr. Vito
Deposited On:27 Jun 2008 01:44
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:57

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Barrett, Justin L. (1999). “Theological correctness: Cognitive constraint and the study of religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11: 325-339.

Boyer, Pascal (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.

DesCamp, Mary Therese and Eve E. Sweetser (2005). “Metaphors for God: Why and How Do Our Choices Matter for Humans? The Application of Contemporary Cognitive Linguistics Research to the Debate on God and Metaphor.” Pastoral Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 3, January 2005

Evola, Vito (2004). “Blending the Erotic and Divine in Mystical Literature.” Proceedings for the Language, Culture and Cognition Conference. University of Portsmouth.

Evola, Vito (2005). “Cognitive Semiotics and On-Line Reading of Religious Texts. A Hermeneutic Model of Sacred Literature and Everyday Revelation.” Consciousness, Literature and the Arts – Vol. 6 (n.2), August 2005.

Fauconnier, Gilles (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner (2002). The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, George (1996). Moral Politics. New York: Basic Press.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson (2003/1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Rizzuto, A.-M. (1979). The Birth of the Living God: A Psychoanalytic Study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.


Repository Staff Only: item control page